2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(03)00044-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The women's health initiative dietary modification trial: overview and baseline characteristics of participants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
141
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomarker data, including fasting insulin levels, were measured in 2 clinical trial subcohorts: the SNP Health Association Resource cohort (SHARe; n=11 967) and the European American Hormone Trial subcohort (EA HT; n=10 161). The SHARe CVD biomarkers study comprised African American and Hispanic participants from either the clinical trials 9,10 or observational study cohorts, 11 whereas the EA HT CVD biomarkers study primarily comprised white women from the menopausal hormone therapy trials. The scientific rationale, study design, eligibility criteria, and baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in these studies have been reported.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomarker data, including fasting insulin levels, were measured in 2 clinical trial subcohorts: the SNP Health Association Resource cohort (SHARe; n=11 967) and the European American Hormone Trial subcohort (EA HT; n=10 161). The SHARe CVD biomarkers study comprised African American and Hispanic participants from either the clinical trials 9,10 or observational study cohorts, 11 whereas the EA HT CVD biomarkers study primarily comprised white women from the menopausal hormone therapy trials. The scientific rationale, study design, eligibility criteria, and baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in these studies have been reported.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants in WHI gave informed consent and were followed prospectively. Details of the scientific rationale, eligibility requirements and baseline characteristics of the participants in the WHI have been published elsewhere (Hays et al, 2003;Jackson et al, 2003;Langer et al, 2003;Ritenbaugh et al, 2003;Stefanick et al, 2003).…”
Section: Women's Health Initiativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants in WHI gave informed consent and were followed prospectively. Details of the scientific rationale, eligibility requirements and baseline characteristics of the participants in the WHI have been published elsewhere (Hays et al, 2003;Jackson et al, 2003;Langer et al, 2003;Ritenbaugh et al, 2003;Stefanick et al, 2003).The following participants were excluded from the original cohort of 161 808 : 14 849 with a history of cancer (except nonmelanoma skin cancer) at baseline, 668 with no follow-up, 7491 with missing values of main exposures and confounders (including weight, height, waist circumference, hip circumference, smoking, and diabetes), and 297 (0.18%) with waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) values of beyond 4 s.d. (WHRo0.4 or WHR41.2), leaving 138 503 women for analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Past large-scale women's health studies, such as the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and Nurses' Health Study, primarily focused on risk factors for individual diseases or general health characteristics of women, without focusing on the prevalence of coexisting conditions or the effect of coexisting conditions on HRQoL. [8][9][10][11] The Observational Study of the WHI studied the primary causes of morbidity and mortality, and the Nurses' Health Study did not report on the coexistence of the conditions studied. Rather, publications have primarily focused on the incidence of a single condition (e.g., the incidence of urinary incontinence) 12 or risk factors for developing a select condition (e.g., relationship between diet and chronic kidney disease).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%