31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01C
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2001.964001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Women in Applied Science and Engineering Summer Bridge Program: easing the transition for first-time female engineering students

Abstract: The Women in Applied Science and Engineering (WISE) Summer Bridge Program is designed to prepare incoming female students for the transition from high school to the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences (CEAS) at Arizona State University (ASU). This program offers academic reviews in courses such as mathematics, physics, and chemistry. Computer-programming tutorials are also offered in Excel and HTML to better prepare students for their freshman introductory engineering course. Participants acclimate to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three of these programs measured retention at every year after students participated in the program until they graduated ( Chevalier et al ., 2001 ; Boykin et al , 2010 ; Gleason et al , 2010 ; Tomasko et al , 2013 , 2016 ), and one program measured retention percentages of different cohorts of students at a single time point ( Maton et al ., 2000 ). Nine programs measured retention 1 year after the bridge program ( Reyes et al ., 1998 , 1999 ; Wheatland, 2000 ; Fletcher et al ., 2001a , b ; Citty and Lindner, 2012 ; Raines, 2012 ; Windsor et al , 2015 ; Kopec and Blair, 2014 ; Harkins, 2016 ; Pritchard et al , 2016 ), one program measured retention each semester after the bridge program through students’ fourth semester in college ( Wischusen and Wischusen, 2007 ; Wischusen et al , 2011 ), and one program measured retention after the first year, the third semester, the fifth semester, and the seventh semester ( Gilmer, 2007 ).…”
Section: Part 2 Goals Outcomes and Successes Of Stem Bridge Programentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of these programs measured retention at every year after students participated in the program until they graduated ( Chevalier et al ., 2001 ; Boykin et al , 2010 ; Gleason et al , 2010 ; Tomasko et al , 2013 , 2016 ), and one program measured retention percentages of different cohorts of students at a single time point ( Maton et al ., 2000 ). Nine programs measured retention 1 year after the bridge program ( Reyes et al ., 1998 , 1999 ; Wheatland, 2000 ; Fletcher et al ., 2001a , b ; Citty and Lindner, 2012 ; Raines, 2012 ; Windsor et al , 2015 ; Kopec and Blair, 2014 ; Harkins, 2016 ; Pritchard et al , 2016 ), one program measured retention each semester after the bridge program through students’ fourth semester in college ( Wischusen and Wischusen, 2007 ; Wischusen et al , 2011 ), and one program measured retention after the first year, the third semester, the fifth semester, and the seventh semester ( Gilmer, 2007 ).…”
Section: Part 2 Goals Outcomes and Successes Of Stem Bridge Programentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the relatively short history of ESSCs, it is not surprising that there are gaps in our knowledge about these support systems as a whole. For example, although many of the experiences linked to a student's decision to leave engineering can be mitigated by appropriately directed student interventions (e.g., Allen, 1999;Amenkhienan & Kogan, 2004;Fletcher, Newell, Anderson-Rowland, & Newton, 2001a;Fletcher, Newell, Newton, & Anderson-Rowland, 2001b;Single, Muller, Cunningham, Single, & Carlsen, 2005;Vesilind, 2001), a shortcoming in our current understanding of these efforts is that co-curricular support is practice oriented: much of the existing research about ESSCs and interventions focuses on recruitment and retention numbers or measures such as student satisfaction (Brainard & Carlin, 1998;Hermond, 1995;Lam, Doverspike, & Mawasha, 1999;Ohland & Zhang, 2002;Van Aken et al, 1999). While these measures are important, little of this research explains how the co-curricular support provided by ESSCs is intended to work or the ways student-support practitioners aim to improve the student experience.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participation in a firstyear seminar has been shown to have a statistically significant positive impact on student success (House and Kuchynka, 1997;Minchella et al, 2002). Longer-term bridge and orientation programs are common and effective in specific fields or for targeted groups, such as all engineering majors (Soulsby, 1999), minority engineering (Reyes et al, 1998), women in engineering (Fletcher et al, 2001a), and first-generation college attendees (Pascarella et al, 2004).…”
Section: The Future Of Biosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women in Applied Science and Engineering (WISE) at Arizona State University (Tempe, AZ) sponsors a Summer Bridge Program for incoming female engineering majors (Fletcher et al, 2001a). This program is also held the week before the freshman fall semester, and it offers reviews in science courses as well as computer sessions and student services.…”
Section: The Future Of Biosmentioning
confidence: 99%