1977
DOI: 10.4039/ent1091599-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE WITHIN FIELD SPATIAL PATTERN OF THE LARVAL EGYPTIAN ALFALFA WEEVIL, HYPERA BRUNNEIPENNIS (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE): AN APPLICATION OF PARAMETER ESTIMATES IN SIMULATION

Abstract: The spatial distribution of the Egyptian alfalfa weevil larvae using Iwao’s index of dispersion was examined in a California alfalfa field. The changing dispersion patterns with time were found to be influenced by both density induced competition for food and varying spatial distribution of host plants. values characteristic for both years quickly stabilized. This made possible a method for estimating leaf consumption rates by larval populations with an aggregated distribution, k being derived from . Field sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods have been used successfully in California to describe the distribution of Egyptian alfalfa weevil in alfalfa (Christensen et al 1977) and various predators in cotton (Byerly et al 1978). …”
Section: May 1980mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have been used successfully in California to describe the distribution of Egyptian alfalfa weevil in alfalfa (Christensen et al 1977) and various predators in cotton (Byerly et al 1978). …”
Section: May 1980mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We computed the correlation between the % older leaves infested with CBF ( (IWAO, 1969, CHRISTENSEN et al, 1977.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little is known of the dispersion pattern of CBF or how best to detect it on urban citrus trees. Data on the dispersion pattern are necessary in the formulation of sampling schemes (MORRIS, 1960) and for use in conjunction with economic threshold data to ascertain the need for control measures (CHRISTENSEN et al, 1977). Accordingly, this research was undertaken to determine 1978.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morris (1955) suggested that an acceptable level of precision in field studies of insect populations is D = 0.10, where D is the ratio of the standard error of the mean to the mean. This suggestion has been widely adhered to in insect population studies, although D ~ 0.20 is usually regarded as acceptable (e.g., Christensen et al 1977). In this study, sample size (n = 200) was fixed at a level where two teams of three workers could sample the six plots and transport the samples 190 km to the extraction laboratory at Ruakura on one day.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%