2001 Annual Conference Proceedings
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--10034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wise Summer Bridge Program: Assessing Student Attrition, Retention, And Program Effectiveness

Abstract: For participating university programs, summer bridge outreach has helped to significantly increase student retention in academic majors. For female engineering students, bridge programs not only serve an academic need, but also serve to foster networking relationships between students prior to starting the semester. The Women in Applied Science and Engineering (WISE) Summer Bridge Program was designed to prepare incoming female students for the transition from high school to the College of Engineering and Appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this paper is to explore how to operationalize and measure student support in STEM-considering which supports transcend engineering and science boundaries and which supports are unique to the engineering context. The traditional approach to monitoring student support is to evaluate the impact of individual interventions (Newton et al, 2001;Samuelson et al, 2014;Single et al, 2005); however, in this paper, we flip this logic. Rather than focusing on specific offices or interventions, we focus on the STEM learning environment more holistically.…”
Section: Purpose and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this paper is to explore how to operationalize and measure student support in STEM-considering which supports transcend engineering and science boundaries and which supports are unique to the engineering context. The traditional approach to monitoring student support is to evaluate the impact of individual interventions (Newton et al, 2001;Samuelson et al, 2014;Single et al, 2005); however, in this paper, we flip this logic. Rather than focusing on specific offices or interventions, we focus on the STEM learning environment more holistically.…”
Section: Purpose and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the development of an item bank, we leveraged the theoretical constructs of the MCCS along with responses collected from students using open-ended surveys along each of the six dimensions of institutional support. This primary round of instrument development allowed us to create a set of items that spanned the full set of theoretical dimensions of student support and to adjust the wording used for each item based on students' feedback; we then began the process for establishing content and face validity for the instrument [11].…”
Section: Theoretical Constructs and Item Bank Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this quantitative paper is to explore the differential perceptions of support between transfer and first-time-in-college (FTIC) undergraduate engineering students using the STEM-SPSI. The existing body of research on student support mostly focused on the effect of specific interventions or student support resources, such as a program within the diversity support office [12]- [14]. However, this study seeks to make this comparison considering perceptions of different kinds of supports captured via 12 constructs identified in the STEM-SPSI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%