2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58507-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wisdom of the Multitude: Diversity Versus Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key question is whether size or diversity is more important in the relationship between interdisciplinary collaborative research and research performance. Collective intelligence research has focused on this relationship, with Condorcet's jury theorem predicting that heterogeneous team composition may be more important when faced with highly complex decisions which are susceptible to bias 59 . To improve the accuracy of collective decision-making, a high level of diversity needs to be maintained if team size is to be continuously increased 60 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The key question is whether size or diversity is more important in the relationship between interdisciplinary collaborative research and research performance. Collective intelligence research has focused on this relationship, with Condorcet's jury theorem predicting that heterogeneous team composition may be more important when faced with highly complex decisions which are susceptible to bias 59 . To improve the accuracy of collective decision-making, a high level of diversity needs to be maintained if team size is to be continuously increased 60 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, our conclusions need to be interpreted with caution, as the relationship between size and diversity may be reversed under other conditions. For example, in real-world social activities, the performance of collective decision-making depends on a variety of factors, such as average individual accuracy and decision bias 59,61 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%