2011
DOI: 10.4148/culs.v1i0.1357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wireless Library: An Assessment of a Library Laptop Program

Abstract: Approximately five years ago, the library at Emporia State University started a laptop checkout program to provide laptops for students and faculty members to checkout and use while they are in the library.  The program has been highly successful with students often waiting in line to be able to check out a laptop.  In 2009, the library purchased eight Netbooks to see how they would be received by the individuals using the laptop checkout program.  With the beginning of the Fall 2010 semester, some modif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the late 1990s, numerous articles have discussed the implementation of a library device‐lending program, including such issues as troubleshooting, budgeting, policy development, promotion, check‐out procedures, and hardware selection (Allmang, 2003; Buzzard and Teeter, 2011; Dodd and Drennan, 2007; Dugan, 2001; Duncan, 2003; Hahn, 2011; Lovgren, 2002; Munson and Malia, 2008; Power, 2008; Sharpe, 2009; Vaughan and Burnes, 2002). Various articles have also discussed qualitative assessment of program implementation or success, including pre‐program implementation assessment (Elwood et al , 2006; Changchit et al , 2006; Holden and Deng, 2005), surveys aimed at determining how patrons are using the devices (Atlas et al , 2007; Gutierrez and Summey, 2011), how laptop lending relates to space usage (Briden and Marshall, 2010), and post‐implementation patron satisfaction with the program (Clark, 2009; Dodd and Drennan, 2007; Feldman et al , 2008; Gutierrez and Summey, 2011; Hsieh and Holden, 2008). Still more articles have surveyed the general state of device lending in libraries or reviewed existing literature (Holden and Hsieh, 2007; Kwon and Soules, 2003; Tees, 2010; Zimerman, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the late 1990s, numerous articles have discussed the implementation of a library device‐lending program, including such issues as troubleshooting, budgeting, policy development, promotion, check‐out procedures, and hardware selection (Allmang, 2003; Buzzard and Teeter, 2011; Dodd and Drennan, 2007; Dugan, 2001; Duncan, 2003; Hahn, 2011; Lovgren, 2002; Munson and Malia, 2008; Power, 2008; Sharpe, 2009; Vaughan and Burnes, 2002). Various articles have also discussed qualitative assessment of program implementation or success, including pre‐program implementation assessment (Elwood et al , 2006; Changchit et al , 2006; Holden and Deng, 2005), surveys aimed at determining how patrons are using the devices (Atlas et al , 2007; Gutierrez and Summey, 2011), how laptop lending relates to space usage (Briden and Marshall, 2010), and post‐implementation patron satisfaction with the program (Clark, 2009; Dodd and Drennan, 2007; Feldman et al , 2008; Gutierrez and Summey, 2011; Hsieh and Holden, 2008). Still more articles have surveyed the general state of device lending in libraries or reviewed existing literature (Holden and Hsieh, 2007; Kwon and Soules, 2003; Tees, 2010; Zimerman, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%