2020
DOI: 10.1111/jeu.12833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Windblown: Possible Explanations for Dinophyte DNA in Forest Soils

Abstract: Dinophytes are widely distributed in marine-and fresh-waters, but have yet to be conclusively documented in terrestrial environments. Here, we evaluated the presence of these protists from an environmental DNA metabarcoding dataset of Neotropical rainforest soils. Using a phylogenetic placement approach with a reference alignment and tree, we showed that the numerous sequencing reads that were phylogenetically placed as dinophytes did not correlate with taxonomic assignment, environmental preference, nutrition… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the colpodean OTUs analyzed here had multiple likely placement locations on the reference tree. These alternative placements were not considered in most published phylogenetic placement studies using EPA‐ng (Aguirre‐von‐Wobeser, 2021; Bass et al, 2018; Fuchsman et al, 2022; Gottschling et al, 2021; Iniesto et al, 2021; Metz et al, 2021; Schoenle et al, 2020). Here, for the first time, we showcased together the features of the program GAPPA tool that can take multiple likely placements when performing taxonomic assignments into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of the colpodean OTUs analyzed here had multiple likely placement locations on the reference tree. These alternative placements were not considered in most published phylogenetic placement studies using EPA‐ng (Aguirre‐von‐Wobeser, 2021; Bass et al, 2018; Fuchsman et al, 2022; Gottschling et al, 2021; Iniesto et al, 2021; Metz et al, 2021; Schoenle et al, 2020). Here, for the first time, we showcased together the features of the program GAPPA tool that can take multiple likely placements when performing taxonomic assignments into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guillou et al, 2013; Ratnasingham & Hebert, 2007) are routinely used for such assignments in numerous metabarcoding studies. However, phylogenetic placement approaches for taxonomic assignments are being increasingly employed (Bass et al, 2018; Czech et al, 2022; Gottschling et al, 2021; Jamy et al, 2020). These two alternative approaches to assigning OTUs are beginning to be compared to each other (Hleap et al, 2021; Jamy et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the colpodean OTUs analysed here had multiple likely placement locations on the reference tree. These alternative placements were not considered in most published phylogenetic placement studies using EPA-ng, (Aguirre-von-Wobeser, 2021;Bass et al, 2018;Fuchsman et al, 2022;Gottschling et al, 2021;Iniesto et al, 2021;Metz et al, 2021;Schoenle et al, 2020). Here, for the first time, we showcased together the features of the program GAPPA tool that can take multiple likely placements when performing taxonomic assignments into account.…”
Section: Additive Likelihood Values and Distances Between Placementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local or global pairwise alignment approaches (e.g., Needleman & Wunsch, 1970;Smith & Waterman, 1981) using a taxonomic reference database (e.g., Guillou et al, 2013;Ratnasingham & Hebert, 2007) are routinely used for such assignments in numerous metabarcoding studies. However, phylogenetic placement approaches for taxonomic assignments are being increasingly employed (Bass et al, 2018;Czech et al, 2022;Gottschling et al, 2021;Jamy et al, 2020). These two alternative approaches to assigning OTUs are beginning to be compared to each other (Hleap et al, 2021;Jamy et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different biomonitoring studies in aquatic environments have used this approach for the survey of metazoans (Mitsi et al 2019 ), protists (Elferink et al 2017 ; Keck et al 2018 ; Gottschling et al 2021 ), and prokaryotes (López-Cortés et al 2020 ; Iniesto et al 2021 ). Recently, a comprehensive and curated cyanobacterial reference database that can be readily used for the phylogenetic placement of these organisms was released ( Cydrasil ; Roush et al 2021 ), widening the biomonitoring potential of this tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%