1994
DOI: 10.21426/b617110417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wildcat in Central-Northern italian peninsula: a biogeographical dilemma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1a). However, we cannot reject the alternative hypothesis, even if improbable (Ragni et al 1994) that low-density populations have previously been missed in these regions. However, we cannot reject the alternative hypothesis, even if improbable (Ragni et al 1994) that low-density populations have previously been missed in these regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…1a). However, we cannot reject the alternative hypothesis, even if improbable (Ragni et al 1994) that low-density populations have previously been missed in these regions. However, we cannot reject the alternative hypothesis, even if improbable (Ragni et al 1994) that low-density populations have previously been missed in these regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Regione Marche and Tuscany Maremma are, respectively, the northern and western borders of the wildcat range in Italy. The Tuscany coastal area, with Mediterranean ecosystems, presents a higher density of free‐ranging domestic cats than in the forested Apennine core areas of the wildcat distribution (Ragni et al . 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The red fox does not perform well in very cold climates, e.g. [Palacios, 1996]; southern chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica [Masini & Lovari, 1988]; and, perhaps, wildcats Felis silvestris [Ragni et al, 1993]). Nowak, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%