2014
DOI: 10.1037/a0036847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The white cube of the museum versus the gray cube of the street: The role of context in aesthetic evaluations.

Abstract: The cognitive and emotional processes involved in experiencing an artwork are influenced by charac teristics of the artwork and the viewer, but also by contextual factors. We studied how the 2 contexts of street and museum, as well as personal interest in modern art and graffiti art, affect aesthetic judgments and aesthetic emotions. For this purpose, we embedded modern artworks and graffiti art in street and museum scenes. Participants with different style preferences were asked to evaluate them for liking, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
77
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, modern graffiti originated in the late 1960s and early 1970s (Austin, 2001(Austin, , 2010. To be consistent with Gartus and Leder (2014), we want to keep the somewhat broader meaning of the term graffiti, but focus mainly on the artistic aspects rather than on vandalism. Hence, we will use the term graffiti art to refer to either graffiti or street art.…”
Section: Street Art and Graffiti Artmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, modern graffiti originated in the late 1960s and early 1970s (Austin, 2001(Austin, , 2010. To be consistent with Gartus and Leder (2014), we want to keep the somewhat broader meaning of the term graffiti, but focus mainly on the artistic aspects rather than on vandalism. Hence, we will use the term graffiti art to refer to either graffiti or street art.…”
Section: Street Art and Graffiti Artmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While some effects of context on art appreciation have been discussed and demonstrated (Brieber, Nadal, & Leder, 2015;Brieber, Nadal, Leder, & Rosenberg, 2014;Gartus & Leder, 2014;Gerger, Leder, & Kremer, 2014;Hagtvedt & Patrick, 2011;Kirk, 2008;Kirk, Skov, Hulme, Christensen, & Zeki, 2009;Marković, 2012;Noguchi & Murota, 2013;Swami, 2013), the actual processes that cause contextual differences are yet unclear. Therefore, in addition to traditional rating scales, in the present study we employed the measurement of eyemovements to study whether the perception of artworks differs with context, or even interacts with different kinds of contexts.…”
Section: Art and Contextmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, it is well established that the perception of any object whatsoever is not context-free, and that contextual information is stored in memory together with object-related information, facilitating subsequent object recognition (Bar, 2004;Engel, Maye, Kurthen, & König, 2013;Oliva & Torralba, 2007). Second, it has been shown that verbal and visual semantic contextual framing have a profound influence on art appreciation, as well as the underlying neural processes (Gartus & Leder, 2014;Kirk, Skov, Hulme, Christensen, & Zeki, 2009;Noguchi & Murota, 2013). Third, the few studies comparing art appreciation of original works exhibited at museums and their reproductions in the laboratory found differences regarding the appreciation of art.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viewer's characteristics which may have an impact of the viewer's art experience are, for example aesthetic fluency (Swami 2013), current affective state and specific art interest (Gartus, Leder 2014), and expertise in art . In the case of online galleries the spectrum of factors should be widened to incorporate aspects related with Internet and computer usage.…”
Section: The Viewer Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%