The Whip in the House: Rituals of Social Control in Parliament and in Society

Abstract

This paper will attempt a comparison of the role of the Chief Whip or its equivalent in Caribbean, British and Canadian Parliamentary systems of government with similar offices in the US legislature. This office originated with the need to 'whip in' members of parliament from wherever they might be to save a crucial vote in a divided house. This office has since acquired the connotations of the disciplinarian who whips members into the party line even while managing to keep the party cohesive through persuasion and rewards for loyalty and rarely exercising the option of excluding members who often resign by themselves or even change allegiance although most of the rebels lose at the next election. The paper will explore the role of the whip from country to country and the implications of such differences and analogies for theories of power and social control.

Analysis of Political Parties Representation in Parliament Influence Public Policy Formulation in Uganda’s Nascent Hydrocarbon Industry

“…The opposition Chief Whips as in Britain provides the same functions in Canada. The Chief Whip communicates to party members' policy position in parliament (Agozino, 2015). The Chief Whip organizes the business of the House, liaise with the Opposition parties, and to keep members from their party informed and organized.…”