1977
DOI: 10.1080/03605307708820030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The well-posedness of the cauchy problem for partial differential equations with multiple characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Example 1. In scalar equations with Levi conditions studied by Chazarain [3], Mizohata-Ohya [18], Zeman [28], one assumed that {a j , a k } = C jk (a j − a k ). It is clear that in this situation a j (x, ξ) = a k (x, ξ) implies {a j , a k }(x, ξ) = 0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Example 1. In scalar equations with Levi conditions studied by Chazarain [3], Mizohata-Ohya [18], Zeman [28], one assumed that {a j , a k } = C jk (a j − a k ). It is clear that in this situation a j (x, ξ) = a k (x, ξ) implies {a j , a k }(x, ξ) = 0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 1. In scalar equations with Levi conditions studied by Chazarain [3], Mizohata-Ohya [18], Zeman [28], one assumed that {a j , a…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the difficulties of proving an existence theorem are centred about the occurrence of non-real or multiple roots. The most extensive recent result related to multiple roots is a theorem by Zeman (22) which may be described briefly, as follows. We assume the most general hyperbolic condition ImA^x, r,^)>0, for f>0 and |£| = 1, tjeR n , thus excluding any exponential solutions that could increase arbitrarily rapidly for large times f>0.…”
Section: Nf(x)=^ \ X (X-tr-i F(t)dt=-±-\ B U^fixt^dumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W2 m _ i a module generated by L, = 1, ..., 2m.Hence we can apply the argument of[19] to this operator: Since Y 1we have, mod R (u) the greatest multiplicity of characteristic roots (not greater than m) and x e L '(X ) with support in outside of E.Using a partition of unity a n d taking the form o f [L, x] into consideration, we have for u e K c c X . Since t L also satisfies the same hypothesis, repeating the argument of [5], we have finished the proof of theorem 6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%