2014
DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159050105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The weed seed bank assessment in two soil depths under various mineral fertilising

Abstract: HUNKOVÁ, E., WINKLER, J., DEMJANOVÁ, E.: The weed seed bank assessment in two soil depths under various mineral fertilising. Acta univ. agric. et silvic. Mendel. Brun., 2011, LIX, No. 5, pp. 105-112 The fi eld trial at the experimental station of Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra -Kolíňany (Slovak Republic, maize growing region, Haplic Luvisol and Stagni-Haplic Luvisol) in 1997 year was established. Experiments were based on 14 ha area (424 x 432.2 m) by long strips method. The impact of diff erent mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weeds are efficient users of nutrient elements with high neutrophils and phosphophilous weeds benefiting from the application of both nitrogen and phosphorus fertilisers respectively ( Blackshaw et al., 2010 ). The use of both organic and inorganic fertiliser application fertilisers in agro-systems does not only benefit the crop but to a greater extent weeds whose nutrient uptake system is more efficient than crop plants ( Hunková et al., 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weeds are efficient users of nutrient elements with high neutrophils and phosphophilous weeds benefiting from the application of both nitrogen and phosphorus fertilisers respectively ( Blackshaw et al., 2010 ). The use of both organic and inorganic fertiliser application fertilisers in agro-systems does not only benefit the crop but to a greater extent weeds whose nutrient uptake system is more efficient than crop plants ( Hunková et al., 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%