The Web of Loneliness: A Netnographic Study of Narratives of Being Alone in an Online Context

Abstract

Using a netnographic and case-study-based approach, this article uses different blogs as data in order to analyse how loneliness is conceptualized and understood. More precisely, the study aims to investigate experiences of loneliness and related themes in the context of online communication. In approaching the nature of loneliness, we have analytically leaned on the theories and some of the most basic assumptions of symbolic interactionism, according to which, social encounters and situations, their qualities and their existence, have a profound impact on emotional life. This study can be read as an archaeology of online loneliness and the findings suggest that the experiences of online loneliness can be categorized in different genres, such as the poetics of loneliness, the diagnostics and self-harm of loneliness, and loneliness and family life. Although loneliness is approached and discussed differently, the bloggers' estranged relationships to society tie these identified genres of loneliness together. The different genres derive their character, form and social dynamics from the narrators' struggle and urge to somehow find a way to fit into contemporary society and achieve satisfying social relationships. Furthermore, displaying and presenting the self, and thus becoming the object of other people's attention and interest, in the context of online communication, can be a profound way of reconnecting to society and hopefully avoiding isolation and marginalization.

A Mapping Review of Netnography in Nursing

“…Of the total number of articles, 26.4% ( n = 14) reported that their study had been reviewed by an ethics board (Alang & Fomotar, 2015; Andréasson et al, 2018; Aragão et al, 2018; Boursier et al, 2022; Cano-Hila & Argemí-Baldich, 2021; Ellinghaus et al, 2021; Gün & Şenol, 2019; Kendal et al, 2017; Lawless et al, 2020, 2022; Moura & Aschemann-Witzel, 2021; Schuman et al, 2019; Vale et al, 2019; Wallace et al, 2018), while 56.6% ( n = 30) reported that their study had not been reviewed (Ari & Mari, 2021; Baptista et al, 2021; Bayen et al, 2021; Bîră et al, 2020; Björkman & Salzmann-Erikson, 2018; Botelle & Willott, 2020; Cuomo et al, 2020; Eriksson et al, 2014; Eriksson & Salzmann-Erikson, 2013, 2016b, 2018; Gatrell, 2019; Holmgren et al, 2018; Johansson & Andreasson, 2017; Keeling et al, 2015; Liang & Scammon, 2011; Manning Hutson et al, 2022; Nemec et al, 2018; Nimrod, 2011; Numer et al, 2022; Poppi, 2021; Salzmann-Erikson, 2016, 2017; Salzmann-Erikson & Eriksson, 2011; Saxena et al, 2021; Song, 2020; Strand, 2022, p. 202; Strand & Gustafsson, 2020; Thunborg & Salzmann-Erikson, 2017; Van Hout & Hearne, 2014); four articles reported that they had applied to an ethics review board (ERB) but had been deemed exempt because their work was not considered human subjects research (De Gagne et al, 2021; Giles et al, 2015; …”

The exploration of corporate image sustainability: A Netnography study

“…In addition, information remains permanently available on the web, allowing users to choose which subjects to access (Camilleri, 2017;Dowling, 2008;du Plessis et al, 2018;Jackson, 2010). In addition to corporate websites, companies exhaust social networking platforms engage with stakeholders through interactive communication (Johansson & Andreasson, 2017;Liu et al, 2017;Tavakoli & Wijesinghe, 2019;Vecchio et al, 2011).…”

Enabling Intragenerational third places as New Incubators of Sociability and Placemaking in Times of Transition

“…in our cities. Loneliness is largely a social phenomenon and a social form Johansson, T and Andreasson T [27]. (Urban) Loneliness, product of partly (urban or 'agorian') social (and even physical) isolation and retreat and partly our own subjective (metaphysical, subconscious, conscious and synchronicity) interpretation of our lives, can become a public health problem in our cities.…”