The Book of the Farm 2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511791833.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Weather in Winter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We subtract the expected number [17] of atmosphericp's, produced by the collisions of cosmic-rays in the air. The subtraction amounts to 9 ± 2 %, 15 ± 3 % and 19 ± 5 %, respectively, at 0.25, 0.7 and 2 GeV, where the errors correspond to the maximum difference among three recent calculations [17][18][19] which agree to each other. Proton fluxes are obtained in a similar way.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…We subtract the expected number [17] of atmosphericp's, produced by the collisions of cosmic-rays in the air. The subtraction amounts to 9 ± 2 %, 15 ± 3 % and 19 ± 5 %, respectively, at 0.25, 0.7 and 2 GeV, where the errors correspond to the maximum difference among three recent calculations [17][18][19] which agree to each other. Proton fluxes are obtained in a similar way.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…The detection efficiency for p's (ε det ) was calculated using a noninteracting proton sample as 81.4 ± 0.1 % at 0.2 GeV and 60.0 ± 0.2 % at 2.0 GeV. To obtain Φ TOA , corrections were applied forp survival probability [19] in the residual atmosphere (ε air ) and estimated atmosphericp production (N atmos ). ε air was estimated as 85.6 ± 2.0 % at 0.2 GeV and 89.8 ± 2.0 % at 2.0 GeV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ε air was estimated as 85.6 ± 2.0 % at 0.2 GeV and 89.8 ± 2.0 % at 2.0 GeV. N atmos , 17.6 ± 3.2 % of the detected p's at 0.2 GeV and 27.6 ± 5.0 % at 2.0 GeV, was calculated by solving simultaneous transport equations [19] with adjusted interaction length (λ) and tertiary production [20]. The uncertainty in this calculation is 18.1% (= (5.0% 2 (air depth) + 8.9% 2 (λ) + 15.0% 2 (tertiary)) 1/2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also subtract the ex- pected number of atmosphericp's, produced by the collisions of cosmic rays in the air. Among recent calculations [12][13][14] of the atmosphericp's, which agree within ± 20 % relative accuracy, we take the one [12] which utilizes the most detailed nuclear model and the 3-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation. Table I summarizes all relevant quantities and resultantp fluxes in five energy bins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%