1998
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004198002540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The weakly almost periodic compactification of a direct sum of finite groups

Abstract: The success of the methods of [24] and [4] in investigating the structure of the weakly almost periodic compactification wℕ of the semigroup (ℕ, +) of positive integers has prompted us to see how successful they would be in another context. We consider wG, where G=[oplus ]i∈ωGi is the direct sum of a sequence of finite groups with its discrete topology. We discover a large class of weakly almost periodic functions on G, and we use them to prove the existence of a large number of long chains of i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [3] and [8] compact monothetic semigroups are constructed which negatively answers this question for the particular case of the additive group of integers for both weakly almost periodic and Eberlein compactifications. Furthermore, [2] proved that the idempotents of the weakly almost periodic compactification of Z ∞ q is also not closed. In the present article, we will follow the approach of [3] to embed certain subsemigroups of the unit ball of L ∞ [0, 1] into the closure of idempotents of S w ( G, μ), where the multiplication map is not jointly continuous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3] and [8] compact monothetic semigroups are constructed which negatively answers this question for the particular case of the additive group of integers for both weakly almost periodic and Eberlein compactifications. Furthermore, [2] proved that the idempotents of the weakly almost periodic compactification of Z ∞ q is also not closed. In the present article, we will follow the approach of [3] to embed certain subsemigroups of the unit ball of L ∞ [0, 1] into the closure of idempotents of S w ( G, μ), where the multiplication map is not jointly continuous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%