The way to a man’s heart is through his stomach?: a mixed methods study on causal mechanisms through which cash and in-kind food transfers decreased intimate partner violence

Abstract

BackgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is highly prevalent and has detrimental effects on the physical and mental health of women across the world. Despite emerging evidence on the impacts of cash transfers on intimate partner violence, the pathways through which reductions in violence occur remain under-explored. A randomised controlled trial of a cash and in-kind food transfer programme on the northern border of Ecuador showed that transfers reduced physical or sexual violence by 30 %. This mixed methods study aimed to understand the pathways that led to this reduction.MethodsWe conducted a mixed methods study that combined secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial relating to the impact of a transfer programme on IPV with in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with male and female beneficiaries. A sequential analysis strategy was followed, whereby qualitative results guided the choice of variables for the quantitative analysis and qualitative insights were used to help interpret the quantitative findings.ResultsWe found qualitative and quantitative evidence that the intervention led to reductions in IPV through three pathways operating at the couple, household and individual level: i) reduced day-to-day conflict and stress in the couple; ii) improved household well-being and happiness; and iii) increased women’s decision making, self-confidence and freedom of movement. We found little evidence that any type of IPV increased as a result of the transfers.DiscussionWhile cash and in-kind transfers can be important programmatic tools for decreasing IPV, the positive effects observed in this study seem to depend on circumstances that may not exist in all settings or programmes, such as the inclusion of a training component. Moreover, the programme built upon rather than challenged traditional gender roles by targeting women as transfer beneficiaries and framing the intervention under the umbrella of food security and nutrition – domains traditionally ascribed to women.ConclusionsTransfers destined for food consumption combined with nutrition training reduced IPV among marginalised households in northern Ecuador. Evidence suggests that these reductions were realised by decreasing stress and conflict, improving household well-being, and enhancing women’s decision making, self-confidence and freedom of movement.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02526147. Registered 24 August 2015.

Women’s economic empowerment and health related decision-making in rural Sierra Leone

“…There is substantial interest from practitioners and researchers in the interactions between increasing women's economic empowermentwomen's increasing power to make economic decisionsand positive health-seeking behaviours. A substantial body of literature supports the idea of gendered behavioural patterns in allocating resources (Peterman et al 2015) and that when women hold greater influence over or control income they are more likely to make spending decisions which improve family welfare and have positive health impacts (Buller et al 2016). Women as key actors in improving health outcomes largely results from common cultural norms, such as the role of women as carers within societybeing more likely than men to be responsible for food sourcing/preparation, and care of infants, children, and the sick and elderly.…”

A Qualitative Investigation of the Impact of a Livelihood Intervention on Gendered Power and Sexual Risk Behaviors Among HIV-Positive Adults in Rural Kenya

“…Some participants spoke of improved relationship dynamics through reduced tension and fighting over a lack of food and money, and of improved sexual intimacy due to improved wellness from increased food consumption. A recent study evaluating a cash and in-kind food transfer program targeted to women in Ecuador likewise found the lack of food and income to be a trigger of conflict and stress within relationships (Buller, Hidrobo, Peterman, & Heise, 2016). The impact of improved food and financial security on violence and/or conflicts in relationships may be an important consideration in interventions that seek to address HIV transmission risk.…”

Cash transfers and women’s control over decision-making and labor supply in Egypt

“…Handa et al (2009) find that a conditional cash transfer (CCT) program improved women's ability to make spending decisions regarding their own money (but not on how the money of other members of the household was spent). Buller et al (2016) find that in Ecuador cash and food transfers reduced the prevalence of intimate partner violence and that this effect was driven in part by improvements in women's control over decision-making. Almås et al (2018) show that in Macedonia, when mothers are randomly assigned to receive a cash transfer, measures of their empowerment improve.…”