2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iccvw.2011.6130444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The wave kernel signature: A quantum mechanical approach to shape analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
567
2
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 611 publications
(573 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
567
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As observed in Section 2.2, the proposed anisotropic Laplacian is not an isometry invariant; hence, its direct application in the computation of intrinsic descriptors [1,13] may not lead to an increase of performance in typical non-rigid matching scenarios.…”
Section: Shape Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As observed in Section 2.2, the proposed anisotropic Laplacian is not an isometry invariant; hence, its direct application in the computation of intrinsic descriptors [1,13] may not lead to an increase of performance in typical non-rigid matching scenarios.…”
Section: Shape Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computing the LB operator directly on meshes with approaches such as [18,15,20], numerous works exploit the information contained in its eigen-decomposition to build a new representation of a shape, either by explicit formulas [23,24,1] or by learning [13,22]. Based on these descriptors, several methods have been developed for segmentation purposes, for instance [14,21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, middle), there remain only a finite, and often manageable, number of discrete ( , r)-symmetries. To extract these we use the fact that point-wise ( , r)-symmetries arise from an -approximate isometric mapping (correspondence) between two regions U and f (U), as defined in (2). Isometric mappings have a low number of degrees of freedom, which has been recently used to develop a direct region growing method for partial isometric correspondence [6].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we prune the remaining point pairs and directions using an isometry-invariant shape descriptor. We choose the state of the art Wave Kernel Signature (WKS) [2] as descriptor, and disregard point pairs whose WKS do not agree up to a threshold τ . Computing the WKS globally over the entire surface is not consistent with our partial symmetry model.…”
Section: Discrete R-symmetries By Isometric Region Growingmentioning
confidence: 99%