2013
DOI: 10.1111/wej.12029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The water supply is fine: decision‐maker perceptions of water quantity and supply‐side management

Abstract: Years of research have called for more science to be integrated into water management decisions and for a shift from supply-side to demand-side management; yet, there remains a strong emphasis on supply-side approaches and in many areas limited attention to hydrological data. A survey and interviews with decision-makers in western North Carolina reveal that there is only low-level concern about water quantity, and this drives a continued emphasis on supply-side management and no perceived need for hydrological… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that the understanding local decision-makers have of citizens' engagement in drinking water issues is almost unanimous: Citizens are thought not to be interested, and not to engage themselves particularlya result that corresponds with findings in earlier research (e.g. Cockerill 2014;Cockerill et al 2016). Additionally, the public is perceived to have no more than a rudimentary knowledge of how drinking water is managed and where it comes from.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Our results show that the understanding local decision-makers have of citizens' engagement in drinking water issues is almost unanimous: Citizens are thought not to be interested, and not to engage themselves particularlya result that corresponds with findings in earlier research (e.g. Cockerill 2014;Cockerill et al 2016). Additionally, the public is perceived to have no more than a rudimentary knowledge of how drinking water is managed and where it comes from.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In the past few decades, several countries have shifted their water management strategies from historical supply‐side measures, which require engineering interventions (the development of new water source and supply facilities), to demand‐side measures, which aim to improve water use efficiency (Cockerill, ; Kishore, ; Padula et al ., ; Salman & Mualla, ). However, this study showed that not all of the dominant implementation tools of water conservation taken by the demand‐side measures will lead to the expected outcome: a reduction in water demand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Available research on decision-makers in the American Southeast also reveals low levels of concern about the water supply (Meindl 2011;Bolson et al 2013;Cockerill 2014). A survey of water managers in Georgia, Florida, and Alabama indicated moderate concern about water system vulnerability to climate change (Bolson et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of water managers in Georgia, Florida, and Alabama indicated moderate concern about water system vulnerability to climate change (Bolson et al 2013). Cockerill (2014) found that rural North Carolina decision-makers (e.g. elected officials, town planners, and water utility personnel) were only moderately concerned about the future of their water supplies and were confident that they could continue to meet water demand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%