2022
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2022.879148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Water Cycle of the Baltic Sea Region From GRACE/GRACE-FO Missions and ERA5 Data

Abstract: The water cycle of the Baltic Sea has been estimated from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and the GRACE Follow-On satellite time-variable gravity measurements, and precipitation and evaporation from ERA5 atmospheric reanalysis data for the periods 06/2002 to 06/2017 and 06/2018 to 11/2021. On average, the Baltic Sea evaporates 199 ± 3 km3/year, which is overcompensated with 256 ± 6 km3/year of precipitation and 476 ± 17 km3/year of water from land. This surplus of freshwater inflow produces… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 1 ), the total volume change in the entire Baltic Sea was estimated to amount about 198 . For comparison, the mean climatological annual freshwater surplus (sum of river run-off, precipitation, and evaporation) in the Baltic Sea is about 480 28 , 29 . The total volume change can be separated between the Belt Sea and the Sound Sea (see Methods) and then amounts to 169 and 29 , respectively, giving a ratio of 8:1.4, which is close to the previously estimated ratio of 8:2 30 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 1 ), the total volume change in the entire Baltic Sea was estimated to amount about 198 . For comparison, the mean climatological annual freshwater surplus (sum of river run-off, precipitation, and evaporation) in the Baltic Sea is about 480 28 , 29 . The total volume change can be separated between the Belt Sea and the Sound Sea (see Methods) and then amounts to 169 and 29 , respectively, giving a ratio of 8:1.4, which is close to the previously estimated ratio of 8:2 30 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%