Since the pioneering works of Fama (1965) and Cross (1973) there have been many anomalies documented concerning the behaviour of security price returns: one of the most prevalent of these being the`January' or`turn-of-year' effect, where returns are much higher during the month of January than in any other month. Lakonishok and Smidt (1988) note that this anomaly has existed for over half a century and has led some financial economists to question the notion of market efficiency and in particular asset pricing models. Lakonishok and Smidt (1988) further suggest that scepticism concerning security price regularities or seasonalities are likely to persist until confirmatory evidence is provided from different data sets over different periods of time. As Mills and Coutts (1995) document, although a wide body of evidence exists for the US markets, relatively little empirical research has been undertaken on regularities using UK data. 1 This is clearly a major shortcoming in the`anomalies' literature, for as Bowers and Dimson (1988) suggest, international comparisons enable researchers to investigate whether factors that are supposedly important in the US, for example, are also important in other countries. 2 Such comparisons are particularly useful because security price regularities and their causes could be specific to individual market micro-structures and economies, and thus an assessment of their persistence across markets is very useful. 3 It is in this context that Draper and Paudyal (1997) present the results of their investigation of the impact of alternative company year-ends on returns, as well as seasonality in bid-ask spreads and trading activity variables, including volume, number and size of trades. Consequently, this makes their study somewhat unique, for as they correctly state:Studies of the UK market are limited and have concentrated on the analysis of stock returns. This paper explores the impact of seasonality on variables including returns within the very different UK tax and equity trading systems. This study varies from existing UK studies in several respects. The current system of market making introduced in October 1986 differs significantly from the previous system. Studies based on experience prior to 1986 do not represent the current system whilst studies