1991
DOI: 10.1016/0168-6445(91)90003-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The wall of bacteria serves the roles that mechano-proteins do in eukaryotes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actin-based cytoskeleton is the major shape-determining component of animal cells, but the cell wall performs this role in bacteria (20,22). This difference suggests that although the effect on cytoskeletal structure may be appropriate for galvanotropic animal cells, it is not relevant for bacteria, which lack microfilaments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The actin-based cytoskeleton is the major shape-determining component of animal cells, but the cell wall performs this role in bacteria (20,22). This difference suggests that although the effect on cytoskeletal structure may be appropriate for galvanotropic animal cells, it is not relevant for bacteria, which lack microfilaments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Despite recent evidence that homologs of eukaryotic mechanopro,teins exist in bacteria (3,31), it is generally accepted that bacteria are naturally devoid of actin (22). We have therefore exploited the serendipitous discovery of a galvanotropic bacterium to explore the mechanisms that elicit fieldinduced directional growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a third class of models that assume the existence of mechano-proteins that could exert forces, causing extension over the length of the cell or contraction over the width of a cell (Norris et al, 1994). This is in spite of the fact that there is no evidence of force-generating proteins in bacteria (Koch, 1991(Koch, , 1998 and in addition although clearly FtsZ and FtsA have a homology to tubulin and actin and are involved in cell division they cannot have a role in constraining the diameter of the cell because of their small numbers and their distribution within the bulk of the cell throughout the cell cycle.…”
Section: Consequence Of Our Observations For Previously Proposed Theomentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The surface stress theory (Koch, 1983(Koch, , 1988(Koch, , 1991(Koch, , 1998(Koch, , 2000a(Koch, , b, 2001 explains the extension of the sidewall of rod-shaped cells by physical forces akin to surface tension acting as the wall grows.…”
Section: Consequence Of Our Observations For Previously Proposed Theomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further progress in under- (43), presumably because of the extreme ionic strength of both their intracellular and extracellular environments. Therefore, these cells do not have obvious turgorbased shape constraints (22) and instead use their S-layer glycoprotein array (25) (for a review, see reference 4) and possibly a cytoskeleton to define cell shape. Since overproducing FtsZ in H. salinarium mimics the loss of rod shape observed with lowered external salt concentration, it is reasonable to propose that altered FtsZ levels, and hence altered interactions between the FtsZ division polymer and the cell wall, could perturb the shape-determining features of the S-layer without causing lysis.…”
Section: Fig 4 Morphology Of H Salinarium Pho81wrmentioning
confidence: 99%