The walking dead: how the logic of<i>Plessy v. Ferguson</i>is preserved in equal protection law in the 21st Century

Wright, Dwayne Kwyasee; Muñiz, Raquel; Keffer, Sarah

doi:10.1080/09518398.2023.2181431

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another potential area is the legal system, which critical legal theorists have argued is far from objective and favors the powerful. One way CSH can help bring these voices to the forefront is, for example, arbitrators and courts adapting CSH-Q to incorporate the voices of those traditionally not included in their legal analyses (see, e.g., [45] -examining the lack of attention to children's needs and voices in arbitration court cases and [46] -studying how courts create and uphold racialized boundaries in equal protection anti-discrimination law).…”

Section: Concluding Thoughts and Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical Systems Heuristics

Gates,

Muñiz

2023

Journal of Systems Thinking

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is not possible to examine a situation or system of interest in its entirety or from all possible perspectives. Boundaries inevitably determine what is included and excluded, which can have practical, political, and ethical consequences. Critical systems heuristics (CSH) offers a framework of questions posed in descriptive (what is) and normative (what should be) modes that can inform boundary setting and resetting in any inquiry, intervention, or evaluation. This chapter first introduces CSH and its early developments and influences. The next section highlights recent examples on the use of CSH from Colombia and New Zealand. The subsequent section identifies several open questions regarding CSH and its applicability. The chapter concludes with reflections on future directions.

show abstract

Section: Concluding Thoughts and Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%