1983
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013<0117:twohai>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wake of Hurricane Allen in the Western Gulf of Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
56
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one is by deploying airborne drifting or profiling instruments, such as expendable current profilers (AXCPs), electromagnetic-autonomous profiling explorer (EM-APEX) floats, surface drifters or Lagrangian floats (Price et al, 1994;D'Asaro et al, 2007;Sanford et al, 2011) ahead of a target hurricane. The second method of observing ocean current response to TCs is by using data collected from current meter mooring or shore-based high frequency radar during the passage of hurricanes (Brooks, 1983;Teague et al, 2007;Jaimes and Shay, 2009;Black and Dickey, 2008). Both methods provide direct measurements of ocean currents and thermal structure in response to a moving TC, and the various factors of the ocean thermal structure which affect this response can be discussed separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is by deploying airborne drifting or profiling instruments, such as expendable current profilers (AXCPs), electromagnetic-autonomous profiling explorer (EM-APEX) floats, surface drifters or Lagrangian floats (Price et al, 1994;D'Asaro et al, 2007;Sanford et al, 2011) ahead of a target hurricane. The second method of observing ocean current response to TCs is by using data collected from current meter mooring or shore-based high frequency radar during the passage of hurricanes (Brooks, 1983;Teague et al, 2007;Jaimes and Shay, 2009;Black and Dickey, 2008). Both methods provide direct measurements of ocean currents and thermal structure in response to a moving TC, and the various factors of the ocean thermal structure which affect this response can be discussed separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D 'Asaro, 1985), with a speed peak usually over 30 cm/s and with a decay time scale of more than 5 days (e.g. Brooks, 1983;Chen et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the ocean OML currents during typhoon passage are mainly determined by the wind stress with a maximum current speed located to the right of the storm track at~1-2R max (Brooks, 1983;Chang et al, 2013). Within this range the linear regression was conducted between U obs (unit: m s −1 ) on the right side of the storm center (45°≦ Direction ≦ 135°, see Table 3) and U h at D~1-2 R max (D = 38-95 km, see Table 3), m s −1 , the corresponding current velocities at~1-2 R max are approximately 2.5 ± 0.6, 2.2 ± 0.6, 2.0 ± 0.5, 1.7 ± 0.5, 1.5 ± 0.6, and 1.2 ± 0.6 m s −1 .…”
Section: Dependence Of Observational Current Velocity (U Obs ) On U Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct current measurements under TCs during their passages include moored current meters, airborne expendable current profilers (AXCPs), drifting buoys, electromagneticautonomous profiling explorer (EM-APEX) floats, Surface Velocity Program (SVP) (Niiler, 2001) drifters, and acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs). Maximum current velocities of 0.3-1.0 m s −1 were observed from earlier current meter moorings in the ocean mixed layer (OML) and thermocline as hurricanes passing by within about 60-100 km of these moorings (Brink, 1989;Brooks, 1983;Dickey et al, 1998;Shay and Elsberry, 1987). Strong rightward-biased currents in the upper OML were identified from 0.8 to 1.7 m s −1 from AXCPs under tropical storm (TS), category-1, category-3, and category-4 hurricanes (Price et al, 1994;Sanford et al, 1987;Shay and Uhlhorn, 2008), and from 1.0 to 1.5 m s −1 from 3 profiling EM-APEX floats under category-4 hurricane Frances 2004 Sanford et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation