2010
DOI: 10.1080/00379271.2010.10697669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wagner Parsimony using morphological characters: a new method for palaeosynecological studies

Abstract: Abstract. The limits and diffi culties related to the tools currently in use for palaeosynecological comparisons of faunas or fl oras of different geological periods are discussed. The new method of the Wagner parsimony Applied to Palaeosynecology Using Morphology (WAPUM method), is defi ned and tested on morphological characters gathered from two insect groups Odonatoptera and Thripida. The diffi culties related to the monophyly of the taxonomic groups used in the more traditional approaches are no longer a p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The insect evolutionary history remains mainly analyzed on the basis of the documented families and orders, ignoring two inherent weaknesses 2 15 : the extensions and definitions of the fossil and recent families vary frequently depending on the authors, and the monophyly of fossil groups of high rank is difficult to establish (e.g., the ‘Grylloblattodea’, ‘Protorthoptera’, Meganisoptera, etc.) 16 , 17 (for discussion see 18 , Supporting Information).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The insect evolutionary history remains mainly analyzed on the basis of the documented families and orders, ignoring two inherent weaknesses 2 15 : the extensions and definitions of the fossil and recent families vary frequently depending on the authors, and the monophyly of fossil groups of high rank is difficult to establish (e.g., the ‘Grylloblattodea’, ‘Protorthoptera’, Meganisoptera, etc.) 16 , 17 (for discussion see 18 , Supporting Information).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the optimal climate zone for the vector insects moved further north with global warming, leaving Astartekløft on the fringes with less abundant insects of this kind. Recent analysis of Odonatan morphological change from the Permian through the Miocene using the WAPUM method however shows no groupings across the ETE, indicating no change in overall Odonatan diversity or abundance (Nel et al 2010). Additional evidence from terrestrial Mesozoic fossil floral and faunal assemblages is still needed to increase understanding of fossil ecosystems, food webs and co-evolution of plants and insects.…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The end-Permian event divides the insects into two major faunas: the Paleozoic evolutionary fauna and the post-Paleozoic evolutionary fauna: the two being so distinct that major Triassic insect clades are more similar to modern ones than to Late Permian clades, just a few million years apart (Labandeira 2005). Another significant insect extinction event is sometimes reported to have occurred at the K-Pg boundary, the end-Cretaceous mass extinction, also congruent with other marine and terrestrial extinctions (e.g., see summary by Schulte et al 2010), although recent research shows that this event may have been minor in comparison with extinctions occurring between the Early and Late Cretaceous (Labandeira et al 2002;Nel et al 2010). Three additional insect extinctions (Late Carboniferous, Late Jurassic, and late Early Cretaceous) are however not synchronous with major events in the marine realm, but represent detectible decreases in an otherwise general trend of exponential increase in insect diversity since the late Paleozoic (Labandeira 2005).…”
Section: Geological and Paleontological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), at the boundary between the Lower and the Upper Cretaceous, during the Albian-Cenomanian-Turonian. This period is crucial for a large turnover among the odonatopteran groups, perhaps in relation with the ecological and chemical changes in the freshwater ecosystems about 100 Myr ago (Nel et al, 2010).…”
Section: Protomyrmeleontid Morphology and Palaeobiologymentioning
confidence: 99%