The Wage Penalty for Motherhood

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. ABSTRACT The Wage Penalty of Dialect-Speaking * Our paper studies the effects of dialect-speaking on job characteristics of Dutch workers, in particular on their hourly wages. The unconditional difference in median hourly wages between standard Dutch speakers and dialect speakers is about 10.6% for males and 6.7% for females. If we take into account differences in personal characteristics and province fixed effects male dialect speakers earn 4.1% less while for females this is 2.8%. Using the geographic distance to Amsterdam as an instrumental variable to dialect-speaking, we find that male workers who speak a dialect earn 11.6% less while for female workers this is 1.6%. Our main conclusion is that for male workers there is a significant wage penalty of dialect-speaking while for female workers there is no significant difference. JEL Classification: J24, I2

The family gap in wages: What wombmates reveal

“…The estimates for women lie in the lower end of the estimates from the international literature (e.g. Anderson, Binder, and Krause (2002), Budig and England (2001) and Waldfogel (1998aWaldfogel ( , 1998b) but are in line with previous Danish findings (e.g. Datta Gupta and Smith (2002), Skipper (2006, 2008)) and also consistent with results from the more recent studies from the US, see for example Millimet (2000).…”

“It’s the Choices You Make That Get You There”: Decision-Making Pathways of Childfree Women

“…Their reflections on work-family conflict are well supported in the literature. Women increasingly enter the paid labor market and stay after having children, but they experience a wage penalty for motherhood (Bartlett, 1994;Budig & England, 2001;Correll, Benard, & Paik, 2007). The women's financial concerns were also accurate.…”

Unemployment scarring by gender: Human capital depreciation or stigmatization? Longitudinal evidence from the Netherlands, 1980–2000

“…Existing research confirms that employers' hiring decisions are strongly influenced by one's parenthood status (Budig and England, 2001;Budig and Hodges, 2010;Correll et al, 2007;England, 2005;Gangl and Ziefle, 2009). The literature suggests that employers discriminate against working mothers in terms of hiring decisions, promotion opportunities, and wages, but not against fathers.…”