2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wada test in Austrian, Dutch, German, and Swiss epilepsy centers from 2000 to 2005: a review of 1421 procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While intracarotidal amobarbital tests had been the rule in the past, the indication for this test in patients with selective surgery which does not affect the language cortex appears no longer justified 30. In completely left dominant patients, more clearcut lateralisation dependent results can be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While intracarotidal amobarbital tests had been the rule in the past, the indication for this test in patients with selective surgery which does not affect the language cortex appears no longer justified 30. In completely left dominant patients, more clearcut lateralisation dependent results can be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Unfortunately, few of these techniques are suitable for children due to their significant drawbacks. For instance, ESM and IAT are highly invasive procedures that carry the risk of severe complications, including stroke, hemorrhage, and infection (0.5% to 5% for ESM 2 and 1% to 11% for IAT 3,4 ). Furthermore, these invasive procedures require the patient to remain alert for language assessment, which is unfeasible in half of children with intractable epilepsy due to cognitive and behavioral problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the rare conditions where it is still indicated, the results of the IAT still guide surgical interventions and the indication of additional, in part invasive diagnostic procedures (e.g. electrocortical stimulation via implanted electrodes or intraoperatively) [2,3,27]. Different from fTCD, fMRI and most other non-deactivating procedures which derive language dominance patterns from the relative contribution of both interacting hemispheres, IAT and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) conclude language dominance from deactivation of the suggested language relevant hemisphere or brain region, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of epilepsy surgery the intracarotidal amobarbital test (IAT; also Wada test [1]) still represents the gold standard for determination of the language dominant hemisphere [2][3][4]. This procedure, however, is invasive and today it appears mainly indicated if brain surgery may directly affect suggested eloquent cortex subserving language function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%