2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
276
0
32

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 623 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
276
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Land-use change alters the production capacity of an ecosystem, modifies the physical parameters of the earth's surface, influences nutritional transport between soil and vegetation, and affects the composition and structure of ecosystems (Zang et al, 2010). Socio-economic changes influence the VES by market price (Schroter et al, 2005;Metzger et al, 2006). In addition, some other demographic, scientific and technological, cultural, and religious factors may also affect VES in different ways (Kumar, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land-use change alters the production capacity of an ecosystem, modifies the physical parameters of the earth's surface, influences nutritional transport between soil and vegetation, and affects the composition and structure of ecosystems (Zang et al, 2010). Socio-economic changes influence the VES by market price (Schroter et al, 2005;Metzger et al, 2006). In addition, some other demographic, scientific and technological, cultural, and religious factors may also affect VES in different ways (Kumar, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not accounting for the many sources of uncertainties associated with grassland management, emission scenarios, climate and impact modeling, these results are only exemplary of the type of assessments that can be performed with the platform for vulnerability analysis in a multi-scale perspective. Moreover, the study should be broadened in order to consider not only climate change, but also socio-economic metrics (e.g., participatory governance index, regional expenditure for research and development, number of patents) informing policy makers and communities to determine priorities, identify actions to effectively manage the impact on society and economy of climate change, and ultimately determine adaptive capacity based on analysis of local solutions (via weighting of different metrics, e.g., Metzger et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…level of integrated metrics, to give an overall grade. The flexibility of the procedure is relevant for evaluating concepts such as adaptive capacity, and how this influences vulnerability (after Metzger et al, 2006).…”
Section: The Fuzzy Logic-based Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it can refer a technique to study the core hydrological ecosystem services and their differential features and also they can be regulated to achieve the goal of gaining human well-being and optimizing the IWRM. As LUCC change the function and structure of hydrological ecosystem, people can optimize the way of land use to create a virtuous circle of society-ecosystem-economy (Metzger et al, 2006;Watanabe and Ortega, 2014). In the middle of the Heihe River Basin of China, Shi et al (2014a,b) has analyzed the changes of hydrological ecosystem services through ecological function regionalization using System for Identifying and Zoning Ecosystem Services (SIZES).…”
Section: Ecological Function Regionalization and Optimization Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%