1967
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0289.1967.tb00129.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Volume of Anglo-Saxon Coinage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are few references on the role played by government accounting in the implementation of a coinage policy to improve commerce. Yet, in economic history, the study of coinage policies has been a main branch of research (Gomes et al, 2008; Oldroyd, 1995; Sugden, 1993, for accounting history, and Day, 1999; Grierson, 1967; Mathias, 2009; Nightingale, 1985, for economic history). In the eighteenth century, for example, many of the European countries followed mercantilist policies aimed at wealth accrual by the state, especially through the accumulation of precious metals, and this involved the effective use of coinage policies to stabilize commerce (Gomes et al, 2008; see also Day, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are few references on the role played by government accounting in the implementation of a coinage policy to improve commerce. Yet, in economic history, the study of coinage policies has been a main branch of research (Gomes et al, 2008; Oldroyd, 1995; Sugden, 1993, for accounting history, and Day, 1999; Grierson, 1967; Mathias, 2009; Nightingale, 1985, for economic history). In the eighteenth century, for example, many of the European countries followed mercantilist policies aimed at wealth accrual by the state, especially through the accumulation of precious metals, and this involved the effective use of coinage policies to stabilize commerce (Gomes et al, 2008; see also Day, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if early medieval dies could have struck this many coins, however, there is disagreement over whether Carolingian mints would have been as productive as this. Nevertheless, for a large mint such as Dorestad even the sceptical Grierson was happy to accept an estimate of 10,000 coins per die, 74 which gives an output of four million coins. Dorestad was undoubtedly one of the most important mints of the empire, but it was still only one mint among many, and almost certainly significantly less productive than Charles the Bald's mint at the mines in Melle.…”
Section: A Monetized Economy?mentioning
confidence: 99%