1986
DOI: 10.1029/hg002p0143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI): An estimate of explosive magnitude for historical volcanism

Abstract: Knowledge of the frequencies of highly explosive, moderately explosive, and nonexplosive eruptions would be useful in a variety of volcano studies. Historical records are generally incomplete, however, and contain very little quantitative data from which explosive magnitude can be estimated. Only the largest eruptions have a complete record back to the early 19th Century; other important explosive events went unrecorded prior to about 1960. Only a handful of the very biggest eruptions are represented in the ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
460
0
8

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(473 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
460
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, volumetric eruption magnitudes (M v 5 log 10 (V) -4, where V (m 3 ) represent tephra volume, (Pyle, 1995) (equivalent to the VEI index of Newhall & Self, 1982), as derived from first-order volume estimates, generally range from M v 5 6.4-7.7 for tephras that correlate with Japan eruptions, whereas our rough estimates of eruptive products originating in the four different IBM regions range between M v 5 5.7 and 6.6. The distal ash layers in the IBM forearc sediments therefore help us to constrain the size of some IBM and Japan eruptions, increase the previous volume and magnitude estimates for known Japan eruptions (Table 1), and demonstrate how important distal deposits are for the characterization of large explosive eruptions.…”
Section: 1002/2017gc007100mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, volumetric eruption magnitudes (M v 5 log 10 (V) -4, where V (m 3 ) represent tephra volume, (Pyle, 1995) (equivalent to the VEI index of Newhall & Self, 1982), as derived from first-order volume estimates, generally range from M v 5 6.4-7.7 for tephras that correlate with Japan eruptions, whereas our rough estimates of eruptive products originating in the four different IBM regions range between M v 5 5.7 and 6.6. The distal ash layers in the IBM forearc sediments therefore help us to constrain the size of some IBM and Japan eruptions, increase the previous volume and magnitude estimates for known Japan eruptions (Table 1), and demonstrate how important distal deposits are for the characterization of large explosive eruptions.…”
Section: 1002/2017gc007100mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This heterogeneity of the fragmentation process can be related: (1) to a heterogeneity (both in terms of microlite and vesicle content) of the magma reaching shallow levels during phase III due, for example, to degassing of the magma along the conduit walls where permeability might be promoted [Jaupart and Allègre, 1991;Jaupart, 1998] rather than a simple vertically distributed heterogeneity [Burgisser et al, 2010], or (2) to processes of ballistic Table 2. Volume-(VEI) [Newhall and Self, 1982] and Mass-Based (Magnitude and Intensity) [Pyle, 2000] Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 10.1002/2016GC006431 formation decoupled from the behaviour of the magmatic column (discussed in the next section). In both cases, the fragmentation level should have been relatively shallow during the different phases of the 2006 eruption.…”
Section: Control Of the Conditions Of Magma Ascent And Fragmentation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the volcano originally rose to 300 m above sealevel, a conservative estimate based on linear extrapolation of the slopes, the volcano lost approximately 40 km 3 during caldera collapse. If this is equivalent to the volume of magma erupted in a single episode, it implies a very explosive eruption, with Volcanic Explosivity Index ca 6 + (Newhall & Self 1982). The WRV Caldera floor shows no evidence of postcollapse magmatic activity in the form of resurgent domes or cones.…”
Section: Stratigraphy Of West Rota Volcanomentioning
confidence: 99%