1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01385052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The voice of the loyal manager: Distinguishing attachment from commitment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have speculated about the factors facilitating voice (Cannings, 1992;Gorden, Infante, & Graham, 1988) and have found voice to be predicted by work satisfaction, supervisory satisfaction, and loyalty (Leek & Saunders, 1992). Cannings (1992) argued that promotion processes, combined with long-term employment security, provide the institutional mechanisms for exercising voice.…”
Section: Model Applications Researchers Have Considered a Variety Ofmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers have speculated about the factors facilitating voice (Cannings, 1992;Gorden, Infante, & Graham, 1988) and have found voice to be predicted by work satisfaction, supervisory satisfaction, and loyalty (Leek & Saunders, 1992). Cannings (1992) argued that promotion processes, combined with long-term employment security, provide the institutional mechanisms for exercising voice.…”
Section: Model Applications Researchers Have Considered a Variety Ofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Cannings (1992) argued that promotion processes, combined with long-term employment security, provide the institutional mechanisms for exercising voice. She claimed, "investments in human resources give employees the ability to exercise voice while structures of promotion within the organization give them the incentive to do so" (p. 265).…”
Section: Model Applications Researchers Have Considered a Variety Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third amendment refers to the concept of loyalty, which has been mainly conceived as a social-psychological variable affecting the choice between different types of response behaviours. Again, the sequential aspect of the framework can be highlighted: members can feel dissatisfied, but in case of dissatisfaction, they will voice or exit, constructively or destructively, their dissatisfaction depending on how ‘committed’ (Saunders et al, 1992) or ‘attached’ (Cannings, 1992) they feel to their organization. Party loyalty would refrain grassroots members to exit (Amjahad, 2011; Close, 2011), but the effect on voice is more uncertain: loyalty can either encourage silence or voice.…”
Section: Characterizing Ipc and Insights From ‘Exit Voice And Loyalty’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the water problem is recognized and does warrant the use of voice or exit in the short or long term, there are other barriers that effectively silence voice or inhibit action. In a study of barriers to exit and voice, barriers to exit were operationalized as transaction costs, and the use of voice was attributed to the ability of an individual to influence the performance and goals of an organization and to share in the rewards (Cannings, ; also see Paul, ). For example, a male respondent in Agege noted that there are physical taps but no running water.…”
Section: Invisible Causes Of Structural Silencementioning
confidence: 99%