The Voice of the Customer

Abstract

In recent years, many U.S. and Japanese firms have adopted Quality Function Deployment (QFD). QFD is a total-quality-management process in which the “voice of the customer” is deployed throughout the R&D, engineering, and manufacturing stages of product development. For example, in the first “house” of QFD, customer needs are linked to design attributes thus encouraging the joint consideration of marketing issues and engineering issues. This paper focuses on the “Voice-of-the-Customer” component of QFD, that is, the tasks of identifying customer needs, structuring customer needs, and providing priorities for customer needs. In the stage, we address the questions of (1) how many customers need be interviewed, (2) how many analysts need to read the transcripts, (3) how many customer needs do we miss, and (4) are focus groups or one-on-one interviews superior? In the stage the customer needs are arrayed into a hierarchy of primary, secondary, and tertiary needs. We compare group consensus (affinity) charts, a technique which accounts for most industry applications, with a technique based on customer-sort data. In the stage which we present new data in which product concepts were created by product-development experts such that each concept stressed the fulfillment of one primary customer need. Customer interest in and preference for these concepts are compared to measured and estimated importances. We also address the question of whether frequency of mention can be used as a surrogate for importance. Finally, we examine the stated goal of QFD, . Our data demonstrate a self-selection bias in satisfaction measures that are used commonly for QFD and for corporate incentive programs. We close with a brief application to illustrate how a product-development team used the voice of the customer to create a successful new product.new product research, product policy, measurement

A neural predictor of cultural popularity

“…A more detailed debriefing of the reactions to each song might have yielded better predictive data. For example, a choice-based conjoint model might have been superior to simple rankings (Green & Srinivasan, 1990;Griffin & Hauser, 1993). Another possibility is that above a certain quality threshold, songs are too similar to prospectively differentiate them, but slight differences in quality become magnified in superstar markets (Rosen, 1981).…”

Should marketing be cross-functional? Conceptual development and international empirical evidence

“…If several functional groups can actively influence decisions on marketing activities, they will show a higher commitment to the decisions reached and contribute more to the successful implementation of marketing activities. In addition, by the participation of several functional groups in the decision process, the voice of the customer (Griffin and Hauser, 1993) is not only heard in the marketing department but communicated to different functional groups at different steps of the value chain such as R&D and manufacturing. These different functional groups are required to successfully implement marketing activities.…”

An Extreme-Value Model of Concept Testing

“…Methods such as voice of the customer (VOC) (Griffin and Hauser 1993), lead user analysis, conjoint analysis, Kano methods, and Pugh concept selection (cf. Dahan and Hauser 2001) clarify and focus the fuzzy front end of NPD.…”