2012
DOI: 10.1121/1.4757097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The vocal repertoire of the Key Largo woodrat (Neotoma floridana smalli)

Abstract: The Key Largo woodrat (Neotoma floridana smalli) is an endangered rodent endemic to the island of Key Largo, FL. There is little information on vocal communication in this species and descriptions of the acoustic structure of calls are lacking. A captive breeding program was established as part of the recovery plan for the species, providing the opportunity to investigate the vocal repertoire and acoustic structure of calls in both wild and captive contexts. Audio and video recordings were conducted at the Cro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We distinguish three functions that an automatic vocalization-detection system should perform in order to vastly speed up the study of vocal interactions: Detection (whether there is a vocalization), Classification (which type of vocalization it is), and Attribution (which animal vocalized). Automated classification has been done in various species, including rodents (Kobayasi and Riquimaroux, 2012;Soltis et al, 2012), frogs (Pettitt et al, 2012), birds (Giret et al, 2011), bats (Prat et al, 2016) and primates (Fuller, 2014;Hedwig et al, 2014), including marmosets (Agamaite et al, 2015;Turesson et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2018). In previous marmoset studies, it was possible to detect the vocalizations by amplitude thresholding of the band-or high-passed audio signal.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We distinguish three functions that an automatic vocalization-detection system should perform in order to vastly speed up the study of vocal interactions: Detection (whether there is a vocalization), Classification (which type of vocalization it is), and Attribution (which animal vocalized). Automated classification has been done in various species, including rodents (Kobayasi and Riquimaroux, 2012;Soltis et al, 2012), frogs (Pettitt et al, 2012), birds (Giret et al, 2011), bats (Prat et al, 2016) and primates (Fuller, 2014;Hedwig et al, 2014), including marmosets (Agamaite et al, 2015;Turesson et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2018). In previous marmoset studies, it was possible to detect the vocalizations by amplitude thresholding of the band-or high-passed audio signal.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have used quantitative methods to examine the vocal repertoire of a diverse array of species, including primates (Hedwig et al, 2014;Fuller, 2014), rodents (Kobayasi and Riquimaroux, 2012;Soltis et al, 2012), birds (Giret et al, 2011), and frogs (Pettit et al, 2012). These kinds of analyses are critical to understanding the types of vocalizations produced by a particular species and for carrying out behavioral studies that investigate properties such as perceptual boundaries between vocalization types as well as neurophysiological studies that investigate neural coding mechanisms for vocalizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small mammals (Rodentia, Soricomorpha) are known to emit ultrasonic vocalizations (Sales and Pye , Kalcounis‐Rueppell et al , Soltis et al , Gilley , Zsebők et al ). Commercial ultrasonic detectors developed to monitor bat activity also are able to record ultrasonic vocalizations produced by small mammals (Kalcounis‐Rueppell et al , Gilley ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%