2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabc50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The VMC Survey. XXIX. Turbulence-controlled Hierarchical Star Formation in the Small Magellanic Cloud

Abstract: In this paper we report a clustering analysis of upper main-sequence stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud, using data from the VMC survey (the VISTA near-infrared Y JK s survey of the Magellanic system). Young stellar structures are identified as surface overdensities on a range of significance levels. They are found to be organized in a hierarchical pattern, such that larger structures at lower significance levels contain smaller ones at higher significance levels. They have very irregular morphologies, with a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
38
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(140 reference statements)
9
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The hierarchical fractal structure of the interstellar medium (ISM) results in a power-law distribution of the ISM components from which we can measure the fractal dimension of the distribution (e.g., Elmegreen & Falgarone 1996;Roman-Duval et al 2010). Within this framework, young star clusters should inherit their clustered distribution from the ISM structure from which they are born; observations corroborate the hierarchy of gas (e.g., Elmegreen & Falgarone 1996;Stutzki et al 1998;Sánchez et al 2010;Miville-Deschênes et al 2010;Elia et al 2018) as well as protostellar cores (Johnstone et al 2000(Johnstone et al , 2001Enoch et al 2006;Stanke et al 2006;Young et al 2006) and young stellar objects (Bressert et al 2010;Sun et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The hierarchical fractal structure of the interstellar medium (ISM) results in a power-law distribution of the ISM components from which we can measure the fractal dimension of the distribution (e.g., Elmegreen & Falgarone 1996;Roman-Duval et al 2010). Within this framework, young star clusters should inherit their clustered distribution from the ISM structure from which they are born; observations corroborate the hierarchy of gas (e.g., Elmegreen & Falgarone 1996;Stutzki et al 1998;Sánchez et al 2010;Miville-Deschênes et al 2010;Elia et al 2018) as well as protostellar cores (Johnstone et al 2000(Johnstone et al , 2001Enoch et al 2006;Stanke et al 2006;Young et al 2006) and young stellar objects (Bressert et al 2010;Sun et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the present work, instead, we aim at deriving the SFH, following a method which requires the data being grouped into spatial bins. These spatial bins are certainly larger than the resolution adopted by Sun et al (2018), but still small enough to allow us to discuss, in a quantitative way, the spatial distribution of the populations of all ages. Therefore, both works provide complementary (and overall consistent) views of the SMC stellar populations, at different spatial scales and age ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the derived SFH, extinction and distance values are at the basis of other population and stellar evolution work being carried out with the aid of additional SMC data (Pastorelli et al, in prep.). Finally, we note that Sun et al (2018) analyse the SMC's young star formation, using essentially the same data but very different methods. That paper uses the detailed spatial resolution available in VMC data to identify young stellar structures and characterize their size and mass distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mostly self-similar appearance of the interstellar medium (ISM), especially at scales L 1 pc is generally thought E-mail: davide.elia@iaps.inaf.it to be the result of turbulence (Elmegreen 1995;Elmegreen & Scalo 2004;Dib & Burkert 2005;Krumholz 2014), because of the intrinsic self-similarity of this phenomenon, triggered by the very high value of the Reynolds number in these environments. The fractal geometry is largely invoked to provide a quantitative characterization of the ISM morphology, as it can be deduced from far-infrared (FIR) or sub-millimetre maps, through fractal descriptors (Stutzki et al 1998;Bensch et al 2001;Schneider et al 2011;Sun et al 2018;Elia et al 2014, hereafter Paper I) and comparing these quantities with theoretical expectations has two important advantages. On the one hand, a comparison between models and observations gives indications about the kind of turbulence that is prevalent in the observed cloud and, on the other hand, the obtained fractal parameters can be used as further constraints for future simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%