2018
DOI: 10.1093/jjfinec/nby008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The VIX, the Variance Premium, and Expected Returns*

Abstract: Existing studies find conflicting estimates of the risk–return relation. We show that the trade-off parameter is inconsistently estimated when observed or estimated conditional variances measure risk. The inconsistency arises from misspecified, unbalanced, and endogenous return regressions. These problems are eliminated if risk is captured by the variance premium (VP) instead; it is unobservable, however. We propose a 2SLS estimator that produces consistent estimates without observing the VP. Using this method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Bandi & Perron (2006), Christensen & Nielsen (2006), Nielsen (2007), Kellard, Dunis & Sarantis (2010) and Nielsen & Frederiksen (2011) provide solid support for these hypotheses. In addition, Bollerslev, Sizova & Tauchen (2011) and Bollerslev, Osterrieder, Sizova & Tauchen (2013), Osterrieder, Ventosa-Santaularia & Vera-Valdes (2019, Li, Izzeldin & Yao (2020) confirm the findings of fractional cointegration and proceed to exploit the equilibrium relation between IV and RV to estimate (components of) the volatility risk premium and forecast asset returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, Bandi & Perron (2006), Christensen & Nielsen (2006), Nielsen (2007), Kellard, Dunis & Sarantis (2010) and Nielsen & Frederiksen (2011) provide solid support for these hypotheses. In addition, Bollerslev, Sizova & Tauchen (2011) and Bollerslev, Osterrieder, Sizova & Tauchen (2013), Osterrieder, Ventosa-Santaularia & Vera-Valdes (2019, Li, Izzeldin & Yao (2020) confirm the findings of fractional cointegration and proceed to exploit the equilibrium relation between IV and RV to estimate (components of) the volatility risk premium and forecast asset returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Specifically, most studies measure the volatility risk premium as VRP t = IV t −RV t . Other studies estimate the corresponding cointegrating relation between IV t and RV t to more accurately recover the "long-run" component of the volatility risk premium; see, e.g., ), Bollerslev et al (2013), Osterrieder et al (2019 and Li et al (2020). 14 Our rejection of stability of the cointegration models for RV, thus, suggest that such measures may convey different information across predictive regimes.…”
Section: Implied and Realized Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Gil-Alana and Robinson (1997) analyze whether the macroeconomic variables involved in the original database of Nelson and Plosser (1982), GDP and unemployment among them, have long memory. Moreover, they have been used to model asset returns, exchange rates, and electricity prices; a few recent examples can be found in Varneskov and Perron (2018), Osterrieder et al (2019), and Ergemen et al (2016).…”
Section: Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, (Gil-Alana and Robinson 1997) analyze whether the macroeconomic variables involved in the original database of (Nelson and Plosser 1982), GDP and unemployment among them, have long memory. Moreover, they have been used to model asset returns, exchange rates, and electricity prices; a few recent examples can be found in (Varneskov and Perron 2018), (Osterrieder et al 2019), and (Ergemen et al 2016).…”
Section: The Fractional Difference Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%