2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccvw.2017.230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Visual Object Tracking VOT2017 Challenge Results

Abstract: The Visual Object Tracking challenge 2015, VOT2015, aims at comparing short-term single-object visual trackers that do not apply pre-learned models of object appearance. Results of 62 trackers are presented. The number of tested trackers makes VOT 2015 the largest benchmark on shortterm tracking to date. For each participating tracker, a short description is provided in the appendix. Features of the VOT2015 challenge that go beyond its VOT2014 predecessor are: (i) a new VOT2015 dataset twice as large as in VOT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
351
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
351
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This data augmentation technique facilitates the training of the LSTM network and improves the tracking performance. Extensive experiments on the OTB [11], TC-128 [15], UAV-123 [16] and VOT-2017 [17] benchmarks demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed method at the real-time speed compared with several state-of-the-art trackers. This exhibits great potentials of recurrent structures for visual tracking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This data augmentation technique facilitates the training of the LSTM network and improves the tracking performance. Extensive experiments on the OTB [11], TC-128 [15], UAV-123 [16] and VOT-2017 [17] benchmarks demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed method at the real-time speed compared with several state-of-the-art trackers. This exhibits great potentials of recurrent structures for visual tracking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2 illustrates the pipeline of our tracking method. Experimental results on the OTB (both OTB-2013 and OTB-2015) [11], TC-128 [15], UAV-123 [16] and VOT-2017 [17] benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves the state-of-the-art performance while operating at real-time speed, which exhibits great potentials of recurrent structures for visual object tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Our tracker is implemented in Python with the Pytorch framework, which runs at 80fps with an intel i7 3.2GHz CPU with 32G memory and a Nvidia 1080ti GPU with 11G memory. We compare our tracker with many state-of-theart trackers with real-time performance (i.e., their speeds are faster than 25fps) on recent benchmarks, including OTB-2015 [38], TC-128 [25], VOT-2017 [21] and LaSOT [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ the expected average overlap (EAO), Accuracy and Robustness to evaluate the baseline and real-time performance. We compare our ACFT with the trackers of top performance in [23], i.e., LSART (CVPR2018), CFWCR (ICCV17), CFCF (TPAMI18), ECO (CVPR17), CSRDCF++ (CVPR17), ECO_HC (CVPR17), SiamFC (ECCV16).…”
Section: Datasets and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For VOT2017, we report the Baseline and the Real-time [23] results in Table 3. In the Baseline metric, ACFT achieves a comparable performance to the top trackers, with 0.317, 0.522 and 0.238 in terms of EAO, Accuracy and Robustness, respectively.…”
Section: Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%