The visual control of landing and obstacle avoidance in the fruit flyDrosophila melanogaster

Abstract

SUMMARYLanding behavior is one of the most critical, yet least studied, aspects of insect flight. In order to land safely, an insect must recognize a visual feature, navigate towards it, decelerate, and extend its legs in preparation for touchdown. Although previous studies have focused on the visual stimuli that trigger these different components, the complete sequence has not been systematically studied in a free-flying animal. Using a real-time 3D tracking system in conjunction with high speed digital imaging, we were able to capture the landing sequences of fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) from the moment they first steered toward a visual target, to the point of touchdown. This analysis was made possible by a custom-built feedback system that actively maintained the fly in the focus of the high speed camera. The results suggest that landing is composed of three distinct behavioral modules. First, a fly actively turns towards a stationary target via a directed body saccade. Next, it begins to decelerate at a point determined by both the size of the visual target and its rate of expansion on the retina. Finally, the fly extends its legs when the visual target reaches a threshold retinal size of approximately 60deg. Our data also let us compare landing sequences with flight trajectories that, although initially directed toward a visual target, did not result in landing. In these ʻfly-byʼ trajectories, flies steer toward the target but then exhibit a targeted aversive saccade when the target subtends a retinal size of approximately 33deg. Collectively, the results provide insight into the organization of sensorimotor modules that underlie the landing and search behaviors of insects. Supplementary material available online at

Wind alters landing dynamics in bumblebees

“…Diverse taxa of flying insects use visual cues to decelerate smoothly (and thus reduce impact forces) when landing (Baird et al, 2013;Srinivasan et al, 2000;van Breugel and Dickinson, 2012), and the relatively simple control strategy of maintaining a constant rate of image expansion has been proposed as potentially universal, allowing smooth landing on a surface of any orientation (Baird et al, 2013). Our results confirm that bumblebees flying in still air follow a pattern of smooth deceleration consistent with that shown for honeybees [ Fig.…”

“…Previous studies in honey bees (Apis mellifera) and fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) have demonstrated that the visual system plays an important role in controlling approach speed to landing surfaces (Evangelista et al, 2010;Srinivasan et al, 2000), as well as triggering key landing behaviors (van Breugel and Dickinson, 2012). In particular, recent work has shown that insects regulate flight speed during landing by the relatively simple strategy of maintaining a constant rate of image expansion (Baird et al, 2013), causing flight speed to decrease smoothly to zero as the landing target draws closer.…”

Optic Flow Regulation in Unsteady Environments: A Tethered MAV Achieves Terrain Following and Targeted Landing Over a Moving Platform

“…Honeybees have no difficulty either in landing on a dancing flower blown by the wind or an artificial moving target [18]. Flies are known to fixate their targets [48] and to land on them using visual cues [49]. Our biomimetic approach to robotic flight guidance in unsteady environments, which differs drastically from those based on more classical solutions, may help future flying robots to acquire some autonomy at a very low cost: the present tethered robot did not need any inputs about the groundspeed, groundheight, platform speed or platform height, for instance, to be able to land safely on a vertically and horizontally oscillating target.…”

The roles of visual parallax and edge attraction in the foraging behaviour of the butterfly Papilio xuthus

“…We think a more plausible explanation is that the butterflies are physically robust enough that they simply have no need to land softly, at least over the range of flight velocities observed in this small arena. This may be a rather common feature of insect flight; when fruit flies land on a vertical post, over a third of landings are 'crashes' where the head or wing contacts the surface before the legs (van Breugel and Dickinson, 2012). This question could be clarified by investigating behaviours such as leg and proboscis extension, which are performed in anticipation of imminent contact.…”

“…These approaches are generally not suitable for insects because their compound eyes typically exhibit little binocular overlap, poor spatial resolution and fixed-focus optics. Given these constraints, a more viable alternative is to use motion cues (van Breugel et al, 2014): when the animal is performing a translational movement, nearby objects will move more quickly on the retina than distant ones and hence depth can be estimated.…”