Abstract:This article formally analyzes the various corrective mechanisms that have been proposed and implemented to alleviate underinvestment in electric power generation. It yields three main analytical findings. First, physical capacity certificates markets implemented in the United States restore optimal investment if and only if they are supplemented with a "no short sale" condition, i.e., producers can not sell more certificates than they have installed capacity. Then, they raise producers' profits beyond the imp… Show more
“…17 Each of these comes with problems. Introducing capacity markets represents a partial reversion to central planning which grinds against the decision to push market and investment risks away from consumers and to investors in the first place (Leautier, 2016). 18 Raising VoLL compounds the risk of, and inability to distinguish, market power (Roques et al, 2005 and others 19 ).…”
Section: Missing Moneymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus each solution involves some form of administrative judgement, and in all cases, the risk of errorviz. exercise of market power with VoLL (Hogan, 2013); overinvestment with capacity markets (Leautier, 2016); or market power and excess reserves with FCASis ultimately borne by the customer.…”
Energy-only markets have an inherently unstable equilibrium, even under ideal conditions, because participants are unable to optimise VoLL events. The addition of intermittent renewable generation is thought to make conditions harder. In this article, optimal VoLL events in an islanded NEM region is modelled by substituting high price caps for Boiteux capacity charges, then analysing the impact of adding progressively more Variable Renewable Energy (VRE)up to 35% market share. Spot market conditions prove stable and tractable provided thermal plant exit and adjust perfectly. But VRE asset allocation is important; absent highly elastic demand or ultra-low cost storage solar PV market share has economic limits because the technology rapidly cannibalises itself. Furthermore, as VRE rises in imperfectly interconnected regions, a tipping point appears to exist where the hedge market enters an unstable zone through shortages of 'asset-backed' firm intra-regional swaps and caps. Government-initiated CfDs for VRE need to be designed carefully to ensure any instability is not exacerbated by extracting contracts from an already short hedge market.
“…17 Each of these comes with problems. Introducing capacity markets represents a partial reversion to central planning which grinds against the decision to push market and investment risks away from consumers and to investors in the first place (Leautier, 2016). 18 Raising VoLL compounds the risk of, and inability to distinguish, market power (Roques et al, 2005 and others 19 ).…”
Section: Missing Moneymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus each solution involves some form of administrative judgement, and in all cases, the risk of errorviz. exercise of market power with VoLL (Hogan, 2013); overinvestment with capacity markets (Leautier, 2016); or market power and excess reserves with FCASis ultimately borne by the customer.…”
Energy-only markets have an inherently unstable equilibrium, even under ideal conditions, because participants are unable to optimise VoLL events. The addition of intermittent renewable generation is thought to make conditions harder. In this article, optimal VoLL events in an islanded NEM region is modelled by substituting high price caps for Boiteux capacity charges, then analysing the impact of adding progressively more Variable Renewable Energy (VRE)up to 35% market share. Spot market conditions prove stable and tractable provided thermal plant exit and adjust perfectly. But VRE asset allocation is important; absent highly elastic demand or ultra-low cost storage solar PV market share has economic limits because the technology rapidly cannibalises itself. Furthermore, as VRE rises in imperfectly interconnected regions, a tipping point appears to exist where the hedge market enters an unstable zone through shortages of 'asset-backed' firm intra-regional swaps and caps. Government-initiated CfDs for VRE need to be designed carefully to ensure any instability is not exacerbated by extracting contracts from an already short hedge market.
“…In real-time, participants are unable to optimise the number of VoLL events. Actions by regulatory authorities and System Operators compound matters by frequently suppressing legitimate price signals (de Vries, 2003;Wen et al 2004;Finon & Pignon, 2008;Joskow 2008, Spees et al, 2013Hogan, 2013, Leautier, 2016. Energy-only markets are therefore rarely in equilibrium, and this creates risks for the continuity of timely investment to ensure the administratively determined reliability criteria is met (Bidwell & Henney, 2004;Cramton & Stoft, 2006;de Vries & Heijien, 2008;Hirth et al 2016).…”
Australia's National Electricity Market (NEM) commenced in 1998 and after two decades it is timely to reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of the reform experience. The centrepiece of NEM reforms was the energy-only wholesale market and accompanying forward markets, and for most of the past 20 years it has displayed consistent economic and technical performance. But missing policies relating to climate change, natural gas and plant exit has recently produced results that have tested political tolerances. The piecemeal and random interventions that are now following are likely to inflame rather than resolve matters, at least over the near term. Network policy failures in the mid-2000s led to sharp regulated tariff increases from 2007 onwards. These policy problems were largely cauterized by 2012 but regulatory timeframes and business inertia meant network tariffs didn't stabilise until 2015. The retail market has been forced to deliver sharply rising prices, and in consequence the problem of rising prices has been conflated with price discrimination; a largely unhelpful development in an otherwise workably competitive market.
“…Other potential solutions include a re-design of the electricity market (Hogan (2005), Roques (2008)) and a strategic reserve. Comparisons between dierent mechanisms are provided by de Vries (2004), Cramton and Stoft (2006), Finon and Pignon (2008) and Léautier (2016).…”
The transition to a low-carbon power system requires growing the share of generation from (intermittent) renewables while ensuring security of supply. Policymakers and economists increasingly see a capacity mechanism as a way to deal with this challenge. Yet this raises new concerns about the exercise of market power by large players via the capacity auction. We present a new modelling approach that captures such strategic behaviour together with a set of ex ante empirical estimates for the new Irish electricity market design (I-SEM)-in which a single firm controls 44% of generation capacity (excluding wind). We find significant costs of strategic behaviour, even with new entry: In our baseline scenarios, procurement costs in the capacity auction are around 150-400 million EUR (or 40-100%) above the competitive least-cost solution. From a policy perspective, we also examine how market power can be measured and mitigated through auction design. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics Faculty of Economics www.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.