1974
DOI: 10.1029/gm018p0363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The viscous damping of atmospheric gravity waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Its can also be applied to the large-amplitude GWs after properly including a scheme to parameterize the effects of GW saturation and/or breaking (Marks and Eckermann, 1995;Vadas and Crowley, 2010;. It is important to note that the theoretical basis for ray tracing is the WKB (Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin) method, which requires the variation of the background atmosphere to be slow relative to the GW vertical wavelength (Pitteway and Hines, 1963;Einaudi and Hines, 1970;Nappo, 2002). For example, in a constant-wind (dissipative) thermosphere, the slowly varying background assumption requires λ z ≤ 4πH (VF05; Vadas, 2007).…”
Section: Liu Et Al: the Momentum Deposition Of Small Amplitude Grmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its can also be applied to the large-amplitude GWs after properly including a scheme to parameterize the effects of GW saturation and/or breaking (Marks and Eckermann, 1995;Vadas and Crowley, 2010;. It is important to note that the theoretical basis for ray tracing is the WKB (Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin) method, which requires the variation of the background atmosphere to be slow relative to the GW vertical wavelength (Pitteway and Hines, 1963;Einaudi and Hines, 1970;Nappo, 2002). For example, in a constant-wind (dissipative) thermosphere, the slowly varying background assumption requires λ z ≤ 4πH (VF05; Vadas, 2007).…”
Section: Liu Et Al: the Momentum Deposition Of Small Amplitude Grmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only GWs with large λ z can propagate deep into the thermosphere ). Eventually, every GW dissipates in the thermosphere (Pitteway and Hines, 1963;Hines, 1973;Richmond, 1978;Hickey and Cole, 1988;Zhang and Yi, 2002;VF05;Walterscheid and Hickey, 2011;Vadas and Nicolls, 2012;Nicolls et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, kinematic viscosity is often assumed to be constant in derivations of dispersion equations of atmospheric waves. [7][8][9][10][11] It is a dubious approach since the kinematic viscosity changes by 5 orders of magnitude between ground level and 200 km altitude. While the assumption of constant shear viscosity would be much more realistic, it does not lead to plane-wave solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This accounts for the "turbopause", which exhibits some variability in altitude that likely results from spatial and temporal variability in GW energy fluxes and propagation conditions. Early efforts to account for GW dissipation at higher altitudes accounted only partially for these damping effects (Pitteway and Hines, 1963;Yeh et al, 1975;Hickey and Cole, 1987). A more recent theory accounting for kinematic viscosity and thermal diffusivity and their variations with altitude assuming a localized, but temporally-varying, GW packet was advanced by Vadas and Fritts (2005, hereafter VF05).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%