1968
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(68)90083-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The viscosity of the alkali metal vapors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of pressure [19] at T > 1050 K corresponds β 12 2 ≥ 2, and its positive sign at T > 1080 K -β 12 2 < 1,2. Rubidium.…”
Section: Generalization Of the Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of pressure [19] at T > 1050 K corresponds β 12 2 ≥ 2, and its positive sign at T > 1080 K -β 12 2 < 1,2. Rubidium.…”
Section: Generalization Of the Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In [19] Bonilla C.F., Lee D.I. eliminating the shortcomings and methodological inaccuracies of the installation, diskovered during the experiments with the cesium vapor, conducted a study of the viscosity of the rubidium vapor in the temperature range of 930 ... 1230 K at pressures of 47 ... 200 kPa.…”
Section: Generalization Of the Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquid sodium is used alongside water as coolant in nuclear reactors [49] and therefore, as for the case of water, it is important to study its behaviour in conditions when nuclear reactions generate enough heat to cause the fluid to boil; the fluid is also used in single-phase liquid and phase-change receivers of solar power plants [50]. The properties of saturated sodium [51,52] in conditions typical of its industrial applications are listed in Initial conditions of the simulation were computed with Scriven's theory at 4 ms into bubble growth (in this case 𝜏 ≈ 0.2 𝑚𝑠), corresponding to an initial radius 𝑅 Q of 2 mm and initial liquid thermal boundary layer thickness of 0.386 mm. As for the previous case of water, agreement with the analytical solution is observed as the grid is increasingly refined, as shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Modelled Bubble Growth Vs Analytical Solution -Sodiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this procedure the Lennard-Jones (6-12) parameters of Table 2 have been employed. In Figure 10, a comparison between our prediction and a few sets of available experimental results [29][30][31][32] is provided. Differences between theory and experiments may come from the presence of molecules or ions in the vapours.…”
Section: B Transport Properties Of the Ablated Vapourmentioning
confidence: 99%