The Virtues of Joint Production: Ethical Foundations for Collaborative Organizations

Bernacchio, Caleb; Foss, Nicolai J.; Lindenberg, Siegwart

doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0389

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 231 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Future work could explore these challenges, potentially drawing on research examining resource accumulation by entrepreneurs (Burns, Barney, Angus, & Herrick, 2016; Clough, Fang, Vissa, & Wu, 2019). Future research could also focus on the use of various kinds of relational contracts (Gibbons & Henderson, 2012; Poppo & Zenger, 2002) and the use of overarching purpose (Gartenberg, Prat, & Serafeim, 2019; Gartenberg & Zenger, 2022) or ethical claims (Bernacchio, Foss, & Lindenberg, 2022) as alternative modes of recruiting stakeholders.…”

Section: Opportunities For Future Research On the Resource‐based Viewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Renewing the resource‐based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods

Helfat

Kaul

Ketchen

et al. 2023

Strategic Management Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The resource‐based view is an enduring and impactful mainstay of research within strategic management and beyond. This editors' introduction to the special issue on “new directions for the resource‐based view” accomplishes two main tasks. First, we describe the contributions offered by the seven articles contained in the special issue. Second, we explain the potential value to research of incorporating into resource‐based inquiry new contexts (artificial intelligence and digitization, distributed organizations, and stakeholders and sustainability); new concepts (resource redeployment, market shaping through resources and capabilities); and new methods (text analysis and machine learning, formal models, policy capturing). The overall aim of this introduction is to help invigorate the resource‐based view by spotlighting a series of promising new directions.

show abstract

Section: Opportunities For Future Research On the Resource‐based Viewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Renewing the resource‐based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods

Helfat

Kaul

Ketchen

et al. 2023

Strategic Management Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While this approach has proven to be a fruitful in business ethics, and in some other strands of management research, we maintain that it does not sufficiently take account of the inherent normative element in business, that is, its ethical core, treating it, instead, as amoral at best (see Wicks, 1996 ). Likewise, a focus on business as itself a practice promises to provide new avenues for integrating research in strategy and finance with business ethics (see Bernacchio et al, 2022 ).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Value creation and the internal goods of business

Bernacchio

Couch²

2023

Front. Sociol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In his early work, Moore argues that business itself was a MacIntyrean practice. He later rejected this view in response to criticisms from Beadle and others. Most subsequent work, including that of Moore, adopted a view of organizations, including firms, as institutions that house a core practice. We first recount Moore's early view, defend and it from various criticisms. We then briefly review research in management and finance arguing that this research supports a view of business consonant with Moore's early view. Thus, we argue that business is a distinct practice that integrates various productive and auxiliary practices to facilitate mutually beneficial transactions. We conclude by discussing implications of this view, noting that it might be viewed as a classical liberal appropriation of the MacIntyrean framework, and arguing that it poses a challenge to MacIntyreans working with a neo-Aristotelian perspective.

show abstract

“…& Lindenberg, 2013;Bernacchio et al, 2022;Weber et al, 2023) have also shown the promise of goal-framing theory for situations of joint production. With these studies, Lindenberg and Foss use goal-framing theory to explain how individuals-often CHAPTER 1…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable Collaboration in Care

Teekens

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interorganizational networks are "group[s] of three or more organizations connected in ways that facilitate achievement of a common goal" (Provan et al., 2007, p. 482). Amidst a wide variation of conceptual and empirical definitions (Isett et al., 2011 offer a thorough review), this general definition is useful as it distinguishes three main dimensions that characterize an interorganizational network: its participants, the relations between them, and the presence of a common goal that provides a raison d'être for the network (Carboni et al., 2019). The definition captures the wide range of forms that interorganizational networks take. Examples in which governmental bodies, non-governmental organizations, and other stakeholders collaborate are policy networks (

show abstract

The Virtues of Joint Production: Ethical Foundations for Collaborative Organizations

Cited by 10 publications

References 231 publications

Renewing the resource‐based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods

Renewing the resource‐based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods

Value creation and the internal goods of business

Sustainable Collaboration in Care

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About