2016
DOI: 10.1086/688036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Virtues and Vices of Albert Naudé: Toward a History of Scholarly Personae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Schlosserian moralism, Rankean objectivity, and Treitschkean patriotism continued to serve as coordinates on imaginary maps of the field, in relation to which historians could position themselves or their colleagues. 32 So how did personae relate to individual biographies? Two conclusions can be drawn.…”
Section: Waitz and Freytag: Two Personaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Schlosserian moralism, Rankean objectivity, and Treitschkean patriotism continued to serve as coordinates on imaginary maps of the field, in relation to which historians could position themselves or their colleagues. 32 So how did personae relate to individual biographies? Two conclusions can be drawn.…”
Section: Waitz and Freytag: Two Personaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the third approach is particularly suited to examining clashes or tensions between generations, schools, traditions, or cultures, each with their own expectations regarding the virtues or skills characteristic of a scholar. 23…”
Section: Scholarly Personaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When Huxley charged Richard Owen with not living up to Darwinian standards, he not only criticized his senior colleague in print, but also tried to block his election to the Royal Society Council on the ground that this would be a moral mistake (White 2003 : 54). Likewise, Max Lehmann, one of Ranke’s students, not only drew public attention to what he perceived as the “unscientific” working manners of his intended Marburg successor, Albert Naudé, but also worked behind the scenes to prevent his appointment (Lehmann 1894 : 129; Paul 2016a ). Consequently, there was no lack of ethical boundary work, defined as deliberate attempts to exclude colleagues suspected of “unethical” conduct from the realm of science (Wainwright et al 2006 ; Hesketh 2008 ).…”
Section: Moral Economies Of Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%