2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Virtual-Patient Pilot: Testing a New Tool for Undergraduate Surgical Education and Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several qualitative studies have described the potential of VPs to develop clinical reasoning skills in medicine and nursing (Gesundheit et al 2009;Botezatu et al 2010;Su & Juestel 2010;Forsberg et al 2011;Pinnock et al 2012;Chapman et al 2013); to support clinical-management decision-making through feedback (Yang et al 2012); and through authors' case-design decisions, such as branching, to impact on efficacy of learning outcomes, including clinical reasoning (Bateman et al 2013). None to date have provided practical guidelines to support the development of clinical reasoning by using VPs.…”
Section: How Virtual Patients Can Teach Clinical Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several qualitative studies have described the potential of VPs to develop clinical reasoning skills in medicine and nursing (Gesundheit et al 2009;Botezatu et al 2010;Su & Juestel 2010;Forsberg et al 2011;Pinnock et al 2012;Chapman et al 2013); to support clinical-management decision-making through feedback (Yang et al 2012); and through authors' case-design decisions, such as branching, to impact on efficacy of learning outcomes, including clinical reasoning (Bateman et al 2013). None to date have provided practical guidelines to support the development of clinical reasoning by using VPs.…”
Section: How Virtual Patients Can Teach Clinical Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In branched VPs, cases provide constructive feedback about the consequences of decisions made, specifically interpretation of critical clinical findings, addressing key decision points, and care management through the provision of different outcomes depending upon the learner's choices (Yang et al 2012;Bateman et al 2013). Metrics such as scoring, time and cost, when available, further help learners gauge their progress, individually, as compared with a group of peers, or with experts.…”
Section: Tipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, based on the indication that VP improve student performance, the aim of this study was to examine the effect that VP have on overall knowledge test performance and improvement of diagnostic thinking ability in comparison to p‐PBL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual patient systems have also been increasingly utilized for self-assessment (Abendroth, Harendza, & Riemer, 2013) or for student assessment in many medical and nursing schools (Fischer, Kopp, Holzer, Ruderich, & Junger, 2005;Gesundheit, Brutlag, Youngblood, Gunning, Zary, & Fors, 2009;Round, Conradi, & Poulton, 2009;Yang, Hashimoto, Predina, Bowens, Sonnenberg, Cleveland, et al, 2013). Virtual Patient-based exams are also being used in sections of national board exams including Step 3 of the USMLE Board Exam (National Board of Medical Examiners [NBME], 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the methods for scoring and grading VP-based exams are still not fully vetted and several different metrics have been suggested (Botezatu, Hult, Tessma, & Fors, 2010a;Fischer et al, 2005;NBME, 2011;Oliven, Nave, Gilad, & Barch, 2011;Perron, Perneger, Kolly, Dominicé Dao, Sommer, & Hudelson, 2009;Waldmann, Gulich, & Zeitler, 2008;Yang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%