1987
DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(87)90011-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The virtual mass and lift force on a sphere in rotating and straining inviscid flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
123
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 394 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
123
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Turbulent dispersion was found to be significant at low dispersed phase holdups but is practically negligible at dispersed phase ratio larger than 25%. Similar conclusions apply for the dispersion model proposed by Lopez de Bertodano 32) . (5) At lower holdup range (≤5%) positive lift coefficient with a turbulent dispersion constant CTD of 0.9 base on Favre 41) yields a better match with the data whereas in the case of higher holdups a constant lift coefficient of -0.003 without the turbulent dispersion produces a good agreement with the experimental data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Turbulent dispersion was found to be significant at low dispersed phase holdups but is practically negligible at dispersed phase ratio larger than 25%. Similar conclusions apply for the dispersion model proposed by Lopez de Bertodano 32) . (5) At lower holdup range (≤5%) positive lift coefficient with a turbulent dispersion constant CTD of 0.9 base on Favre 41) yields a better match with the data whereas in the case of higher holdups a constant lift coefficient of -0.003 without the turbulent dispersion produces a good agreement with the experimental data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…(Rande 12) ). For steady-state incompressible flow in the absence of mass transfer, external body forces such as the centrifugal forces, and virtual mass effects (which assume significance only when high-frequency fluctuations of the relative velocity are predominant; Drew 32) ; Chen et al 14) ), the momentum conservation equation simplifies to:…”
Section: Conservation Of Momentummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work concentrates on bubbly flow regime with 2.88 mm small spherical bubbles, where only positive lift force coefficient is sufficient which can be in the range of 0.1 to 0.5. Drew and Lahey 25) proposed CL = 0.5 based on objectivity arguments. So CL is set to 0.5.…”
Section: Interfacial Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, it follows from equation (7-4) that We shall observe that for range of parameters considered, the roots of the quadratic equation (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) always have negative real parts. We also observe that the constraint _:quation (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) is always satisfied for the range of parameters.…”
Section: I_1mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…where the C's in equations (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) are given by, (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) where, A caref_al investigation in these equations (6-21)- (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) Anderson and Jackson, we use a procedure similar to theirs to obtain a quadratic equation in the growth number. We set parameters 0_1°,0_2°and 0_4°to be zero.…”
Section: I_1mentioning
confidence: 99%