This article explores the leaking of confidential information about secret Home Office plans to house convicted paedophiles within a local community (albeit inside a prison). It argues that a politics of paedophilia has emerged in which inter-agency consensus on the issue of 'what to do' with high-profile sex offenders has broken down. Accordingly, the article situates newspaper 'outing' of paedophiles in the community in relation to vigilante journalism and leaked information from official agencies. The article then presents research findings from a case study of news events set in train following a whistle-blowing reaction by Prison Officers' Association officials to Home Office plans. Drawing from a corpus of 10 interviews with journalists and key protagonists in the story, the article discusses both the dynamics of whistle blowing about paedophiles and also what happens after the whistle has blown.
Key wordsinter-agency conflict; local press; news leaks; paedophiles in the community; vigilante journalism
INTRODUCTIONIn April 1998, towns and cities across southern England were the setting for a modernday vigilante hunt. A posse of journalists was seeking a 68-year-old man recently thought to have moved to the region. Details of the hunt were widely reported but their quarry, Robert Oliver, was reluctant to make his whereabouts known. He had good reason to fear being identified, however. Oliver had just been declared Britain's most predatory paedophile and child killer. Having served 11 years for the rape and murder of a 14-yearold boy, his crime ensured that that he would receive little public sympathy. Indeed, so reviled was Oliver that rumours of his presence in a community were enough to bring angry crowds onto the streets demanding his removal. A number of protestors carried CRIME MEDIA CULTURE