The views of young children in the UK about obesity, body size, shape and weight: a systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundThere are high levels of concern about childhood obesity, with obese children being at higher risk of poorer health both in the short and longer terms. Children's attitudes to, and beliefs about, their bodies have also raised concern. Children themselves have a stake in this debate; their perspectives on this issue can inform the ways in which interventions aim to work.This systematic review of qualitative and quantitative research aimed to explore the views of UK children about the meanings of obesity and body size, shape or weight and their own experiences of these issues.MethodsWe conducted sensitive searches of electronic databases and specialist websites, and contacted experts. We included studies published from the start of 1997 which reported the perspectives of UK children aged 4-11 about obesity or body size, shape or weight, and which described key aspects of their methods. Included studies were coded and quality-assessed by two reviewers independently.Findings were synthesised in two analyses: i) an interpretive synthesis of findings from open-ended questions; and ii) an aggregative synthesis of findings from closed questions. We juxtaposed the findings from the two syntheses. The effect of excluding the lowest quality studies was explored. We also consulted young people to explore the credibility of a subset of findings.ResultsWe included 28 studies. Instead of a focus on health, children emphasised the social impact of body size, describing experiences and awareness of abuse and isolation for children with a greater weight. Body size was seen as under the individual's control and children attributed negative characteristics to overweight people. Children actively assessed their own size; many wished their bodies were different and some were anxious about their shape.Reviewers judged that children's engagement and participation in discussion had only rarely been supported in the included studies, and few study findings had depth or breadth.ConclusionsInitiatives need to consider the social aspects of obesity, in particular unhelpful beliefs, attitudes and discriminatory behaviours around body size. Researchers and policy-makers should involve children actively and seek their views on appropriate forms of support around this issue.

“No fat friend of mine”: Young children's responses to overweight and disability

“…These children's own friendship preferences for healthy weight or thin shaped characters over fat characters are in agreement with other studies in this age group (e.g., Musher-Eizenman et al, 2004) and in older children (Hill & Silver, 1995). The social rejection aspect of anti-fat bias is evident in the mere proximity literature above, in adolescent social network analyses (Strauss & Pollack, 2003), and evidence reviews of research with children of primary school age (Rees et al, 2011). Similarly, the cooccurrence of obesity and impaired social acceptance has been observed in the US Early Childhood Longitudinal Study when children were 9 to 11-years-old (Jackson & Cunningham, 2015).…”

“…This contrasts with much clearer evidence of gender differences in older children and adolescents (Rees, Oliver, Woodman, & Thomas, 2011). Accordingly, investigating young children's responses to a female character drawn identically to the male character above (healthy weight, fat, in a wheelchair) was the main aim of the second study.…”

Hypertension in Bangladesh: a review

“…Studies involving ethnic minorities in UK have shown increasing prevalence of obesity, greater risk of developing HTN, lower level of physical activity, higher mean total calorie intake, and altered perception to childhood obesity by the parents in south Asian population, and the situation is even worse in Bangladeshi childen. [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] Further research is needed in this field to elucidate the different aspects of childhood HTN in Bangladesh and to chalk-out plan to prevent adult HTN more efficiently.…”

Does the effectiveness of forest protected areas differ conditionally on their type of governance?

“…(see [11]:483)). 2) Qualitative studies: Qualitative studies will be assessed using Harden's methodology [54] applied in Rees et al [55] and Pullin et al [37]. This assessment tool uses eight study validity criteria focusing on 1) study design and methods (rigour of sampling, data collection and analysis); 2) findings (how well presented data support findings, quality of findings); 3) use of methods to assess the respondents' perspectives and experiences.…”