The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The views of European clinicians on guidelines for long‐term follow‐up of childhood cancer survivors

Abstract: Background Evidence‐based guidelines are needed to guide effective long‐term follow‐up (LTFU) of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) at risk of late adverse effects (LAEs). We aimed to ascertain the use of LTFU guidelines throughout Europe, and seek views on the need for pan‐European LTFU guidelines. Procedures One expert clinician from each of 44 European countries was invited to participate in an online survey. Information was sought regarding the use and content of LTFU guidelines in the respondent's centre an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Such resources have the potential to support professionals to successfully integrate health behaviour promotion into usual care routines. As previously highlighted, the inclusion of specific information about lifestyle and health behaviour within long-term follow-up guidelines for TYA cancer survivors would be a positive first step [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such resources have the potential to support professionals to successfully integrate health behaviour promotion into usual care routines. As previously highlighted, the inclusion of specific information about lifestyle and health behaviour within long-term follow-up guidelines for TYA cancer survivors would be a positive first step [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidelines in use include recommendations regarding physical LAEs (late adverse effects) for which surveillance should be performed (n=22, 96%), the specific groups of survivors at risk of the specified LAEs, and also the frequency at which surveillance of these LEAs should be carried out (both n=23, 100%). The survey highlighted the absence of recommendations in existing guidelines for many aspects of LTFU and revealed widespread recognition of the need for pan-European LTFU guidelines that include aspects of service delivery as well as the actual content of LTFU care [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Many other groups developed recom mendations for childhood cancer survivors mainly based on the recommendations of the COG and UKCCSG guidelines. 105 The present guidelines have been produced within different groups and different methods, leading to duplication in investigations and a high variation in the recommendations for the same health problems in survivors of childhood cancer. 13 …”
Section: Risk-based Health Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…121,122 As noted, many country-specific guidelines for the long-term follow-up of childhood cancer have been developed; 13,15–17,104 a continuing international harmonisation effort will unify and clarify these recommendations. 18,105,123 Therefore, continued enhancements to survivorship care via the survivorship care plan, the Survivorship Passport work of the European Network for Cancer Research in Children and Adolescents, 120 and the harmonised guidelines 18,105,123 should result in improvements in care for survivors of childhood cancer. Nonetheless, cancer therapy, long-term follow-up recommendations, and individual provider and patient needs might be substantially heterogeneous.…”
Section: Risk-based Health Carementioning
confidence: 99%