42For a given gene, different mutations influence organismal phenotypes to varying 43 degrees. However, the expressivity of these variants not only depends on the DNA lesion 44 associated with the mutation, but also on factors including the genetic background and 45 rearing environment. The degree to which these factors influence related alleles, genes, or 46 pathways similarly, and whether similar developmental mechanisms underlie variation in the 47 expressivity of a single allele across conditions and variation across alleles is poorly 48 understood. Besides their fundamental biological significance, these questions have 49 important implications for the interpretation of functional genetic analyses, for example, if 50 these factors alter the ordering of allelic series or patterns of complementation. We 51 examined the impact of genetic background and rearing environment for a series of 52 mutations spanning the range of phenotypic effects for both the scalloped and vestigial 53 genes, which influence wing development in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetic background 54 and rearing environment influenced the phenotypic outcome of mutations, including intra-55 genic interactions, particularly for mutations of moderate expressivity. We examined whether 56 cellular correlates (such as cell proliferation during development) of these phenotypic effects 57 matched the observed phenotypic outcome. While cell proliferation decreased with 58 mutations of increasingly severe effects, surprisingly it did not co-vary strongly with the 59 degree of background dependence. We discuss these findings and propose a 60 phenomenological model to aid in understanding the biology of genes, and how this 61 influences our interpretation of allelic effects in genetic analysis. 62 63 Author Summary 64 Different mutations in a gene, or in genes with related functions, can have effects of 65 varying severity. Studying sets of mutations and analyzing how they interact are essential 66 components of a geneticist's toolkit. However, the effects caused by a mutation depend not 67 only on the mutation itself, but on additional genetic variation throughout an organism's 68 genome and on the environment that organism has experienced. Therefore, identifying how 69 the genomic and environmental context alter the expression of mutations is critical for 70 making reliable inferences about how genes function. Yet studies on this context 71 dependence have largely been limited to single mutations in single genes. We examined 72 how the genomic and environmental context influence the expression of multiple mutations 73 in two related genes affecting the fruit fly wing. Our results show that the genetic and 74 3 environmental context generally affect the expression of related mutations in similar ways. 75 However, the interactions between two different mutations in a single gene sometimes 76 depended strongly on context. In addition, cell proliferation in the developing wing and adult 77 wing size were not affected by the genetic and environmental context...