1994
DOI: 10.3133/ofr94438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Venus geologic mappers' handbook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering their small size, we mapped only the brighter and larger clusters (>10 km long), consistent with the larger hollow groups collected in the database of Thomas et al (2014a). Following USGS recommendations (Tanaka et al, 2011), our mapping scale led us to avoid digitising outcrops (e.g. central peaks) smaller than 4 km.…”
Section: Geodatabase Structure and Line Drawingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering their small size, we mapped only the brighter and larger clusters (>10 km long), consistent with the larger hollow groups collected in the database of Thomas et al (2014a). Following USGS recommendations (Tanaka et al, 2011), our mapping scale led us to avoid digitising outcrops (e.g. central peaks) smaller than 4 km.…”
Section: Geodatabase Structure and Line Drawingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mapping scale is the scale at which it is recommended to draw lines. USGS guidelines suggest drawing contacts at a scale two to five times larger than the final output scale (Tanaka, Skinner, & Hare, 2011). Generally, drawing contacts at a scale five times larger generates cleaner and smoother linework.…”
Section: Mapping and Final Output Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In distinguishing our units we followed the recommendations of The Venus Geologic Mappers' Handbook (Tanaka, 1994), which, in turn, inherits experience of the geologic mapping of the Solar System planets and satellites summarized in Wilhelms (1990). Mapping Venus (or other planets) is based on photogeologic analysis of images of the planets.…”
Section: Description Of Geologic Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of Venus this work began with available local (e.g., Campbell et al, 1990) and regional (e.g., Kotelnikov et al, 1989) coverage, but global analyses were not possible until global SAR images with a resolution of 120± 220 m of almost the entire surface of Venus were acquired by the Magellan mission . Beginning in the early 1990s this work started partly as initiatives of individual researchers and groups, and as part of the NASA-funded Venus Geological Mapping Program coordinated by the US Geological Survey (Tanaka, 1994). This paper is derived from a presentation made at the Chapman Conference on Geodynamics of Venus on 4±6 September 1997, in Snowmass at Aspen, Colorado.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some alternate criteria are needed in order to assemble different local areas into global stratigraphic units. As is the case on other planets and satellites, these criteria can be developed through photogeologic mapping and stratigraphic studies, which are a goal of numerous ongoing mapping projects for Venus [Tanaka, 1994; The first goal of this paper is to consider the published age estimates in the context of this global stratigraphic model in order to further test the model. The second goal is to use the stratigraphy as a tool to summarize a scenario for the geologic history of Venus that is consistent with crater density esimates and other crater-based evidence for the duration of various geologic processes and events.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%