2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2020.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ventriculo-ureteral shunt: An underused, valuable neurosurgical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a few cases of VU shunts have been reported in the literature and several case reports describe adult patients where the size of the ureters is more favourable for this procedure [6,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. One of the few long-term follow-ups described good results in four patients, provided they had a low-pressure urinary bladder without urinary tract infections [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only a few cases of VU shunts have been reported in the literature and several case reports describe adult patients where the size of the ureters is more favourable for this procedure [6,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. One of the few long-term follow-ups described good results in four patients, provided they had a low-pressure urinary bladder without urinary tract infections [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications such as shunt obstruction, infection (with and without associated urinary tract infection), migration or kinking of the tubing, and metabolic complications were described [16]. Many failures have been described to be due to calcification of the distal catheter, which is a known complication of ureteral stenting [9]. There is also the theoretical risk for retrograde reflux of urine into CSF spaces, although this has not been described in any cases [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 13 ] A VU shunt with ureter implantation into a psoas bladder without nephrectomy presented with no side effects 3 months after shunt placement. [ 17 ] Finally, two cases were reported to have no side effects at 4 weeks and 1.5 years following VU placement. [ 18 ] Additional cases were considered successful at relieving hydrocephalus, but they did report treatable side effects; reported side effects included ureter spasm, [ 9 ] dehydration and electrolyte disturbance, [ 10 , 11 ] high wound output, [ 11 ] infection, [ 12 , 16 ] shunt displacement, [ 16 ] and tube kinking.…”
Section: Narrative Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications such as shunt obstruction, infection (with and without associated urinary tract infection), migration or kinking of the tubing and metabolic complications were described 16 . Many failures have been described to be due to calci cation of the distal catheter, which is a known complication of ureteral stenting 9 . There is also the theoretical risk for retrograde re ux of urine into CSF spaces, although this has not been described in any cases 12 .…”
Section: Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%