1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf02666953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The velocity field in the molten slag region of esr systems: a comparison of measurements in a model system with theoretical predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of CO bubbles on bath stirring was considered negligible because they only affect the immediate vicinity of the electrodes. Velocities calculated in the present work was marginally higher than in other similar studies, the latter ranging from 0.03 to 0.43 m/s [6,7,10,11,27,28,31,35,36] . This may be attributed to lower slag viscosity values in this study ( Table 1 ) compared to the literature.…”
Section: Velocitycontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…The influence of CO bubbles on bath stirring was considered negligible because they only affect the immediate vicinity of the electrodes. Velocities calculated in the present work was marginally higher than in other similar studies, the latter ranging from 0.03 to 0.43 m/s [6,7,10,11,27,28,31,35,36] . This may be attributed to lower slag viscosity values in this study ( Table 1 ) compared to the literature.…”
Section: Velocitycontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…We cannot obtain local solidification time directly, so Flemings [39] put forward the relationship of LST and dendritic spacing as shown in Eq. [36]:…”
Section: Molten Steel Pool and Remelting Ratementioning
confidence: 98%
“…These results are similar to previous simulation results. [5][6][7][8][9][35][36][37] C. Electrode Fusion Model…”
Section: A Validation Of the Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliable power efficiency is achieved from literature. 30) Nevertheless, it has to be modified built on the actual condition of our experiment. A value of 0.18 has been adopted in the work.…”
Section: Fluid Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%